Posts Tagged ‘Valerie Jarrett’

Ferguson: Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett secretly briefs civil rights leaders

by Jim Kouri on Friday, August 22nd, 2014

This is article 45 of 45 in the topic Equal Rights/Civil Rights

After President Barack Obama warned Americans not to “rush to judgement” regarding the case of a white cop, Darren Wilson, shooting an unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, Obama’s top adviser Valerie Jarrett on Monday secretly held a conference via telephone and Skype with a number civil rights leaders to brief them on the prosecution of the Ferguson, Missouri, police officer, according to Frederick Pearlman, a police official in Washington, D.C.

While saying his administration is being unbiased about the case, Obama’s staff — especially Jarrett, who is called by many “Obama’s puppetmaster” — is working the phones to assure the Democratic Party’s important “civil rights community” voting block, said Pearlman, a former president of a top police organization.

Attorney General Eric Holder and White House adviser Valerie Jarrett assured the leaders, who are still not identified, that the Brown case is a top priority. Holder allegedly took part in the phone conference, as well.

Holder and the people on the call discussed the FBI agents locating more than 200 people to interview about the case. Holder reportedly said that the FBI agents are attempting to find out is there is sufficient evidence to show that the Ferguson police officer used excessive force and violated the 6’4″ tall, 290 lbs. Brown’s civil rights that can be used in a federal criminal prosecution.

She also said that during his televised briefings,Obama wanted to reiterate to law enforcement officials how they have constitutional limits even when facing the rioters and to let them know that Holder will not rest until the case is resolved.

Meanwhile on Tuesday, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon was accused of taking sides in the Ferguson tragedy by making statements about “justice” for the Brown family.

Gov. Nixon said that a “vigorous prosecution must now be pursued” even before there was an indictment by the grand jury. He also said that the prosecution has an “obligation to achieve justice in the shooting death of Michael Brown… and it must be carried out thoroughly, promptly, and correctly; and I call upon them to meet those expectations.”

“Finally, once we have achieved peace in Ferguson and justice for the family of Michael Brown, we must remain committed to rebuilding the trust that has been lost, mending what has been broken, and healing the wounds we have endured,” said the Democrat.

“I was floored by his statements. Justice is justice. You don’t prosecute someone just to give someone else justice, you do it to give justice for all. This governor, like Eric Holder, is a disgrace,” said former police detective Iris Aquino.

Go straight to Post

A STINKWEED BY ANY NAME

by Burt Prelutsky on Monday, December 2nd, 2013

by Burt Prelutsky

WOULDN’T IT BE NICE to be able to get through a single day without being reminded that something in the air or in the water has polluted America to such an extent that we have come to accept insanity as the norm?

For instance, the annual furor over Christmas has already begun. While it appears to be perfectly fine for textbooks to praise Islam while ignoring all the other religions and for schools to celebrate Muslim culture while denigrating our own and for teachers to indoctrinate our kids with the glory of socialism, the one place where the line gets drawn is when it comes to singing Christmas carols. The three options seem to be that they are banned entirely, banned only during the month of December or merely sprinkled in among such holiday ditties as “Frosty the Snowman” and “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.”

A news item that should be of even greater concern is that during this calendar year, at least nine generals and flag officers have been purged from the military by this administration. Although everything done by this administration can and should be traced back to Obama, whether it’s the IRS targeting conservatives; Operation Fast & Furious; encouraging the Benghazi massacre to happen and then covering up the gruesome facts; or the disaster known as the Affordable Care Act; Obama can always be counted on to remain in the shadows, letting others – Lois Lerner, Eric Holder, Susan Rice, all the Democrats up for re-election next November – take the heat, apparently the military purge has Valerie Jarrett’s fingerprints all over it.

In case you’ve never heard of Ms. Jarrett, she is the confidant of both Obamas, and pretty much plays the role for Barack and Michelle that Rasputin, the Mad Monk, played for Czar Nicolas and the Czarina, Alexandra. She, like Barack, comes out of the sewers of Chicago politics. Therefore, it didn’t matter whether the fired brass were pretty good at their jobs; what really mattered were whether they were in sync with Obama’s left-wing policies, which included gays serving openly in the military, women serving in the front lines and this administration playing footsies with Syria, Russia and Iran.

It is ironic, though, that at the same time that Obama is dismissing men who have actually engaged in warfare, he apparently bragged, according to Mark Halperin’s new book, “Double Down,” “I’m really good at killing people. I didn’t think that would be my strong suit.”

Personally, I can’t help wondering if Oslo has already sent a guy named Gunderson to the White House to take back the Nobel Peace Prize.

Apparently, Obama was referring to the drone strikes, but one could easily expand the statement to include the Affordable Care Act, which has already deprived nearly four million people of their health insurance, and which, by the end of 2014, when the employer mandate kicks in, could easily add another 50 or 60 million.

I know a lot of people are wishing that the election for governor in Virginia had taken place a few days later. Thanks to ObamaCare, all the momentum was shifting to the Republican, Ken Cuccinelli, and away from the Democrat, Terry McAuliffe, best known as a bag man for the Clintons.

Click to continue reading “A STINKWEED BY ANY NAME”
Go straight to Post

Obama’s Women

by John Myers on Wednesday, January 16th, 2013

This is article 798 of 1004 in the topic Obama
Obama’s Women

UPI FILE
It isn’t unusual to find senior adviser Valerie Jarrett, left, with Michelle and Barack Obama. Jarrett is a fixture at the White House.

I wrote this headline to get your attention. The truth is that President Barack Obama is nothing like President John F. Kennedy. He isn’t even like President Bill Clinton, who pretended to be Kennedy by chasing young interns around the Oval Office instead of sleeping with Hollywood starlets or mob bosses’ girlfriends.

Instead, Obama has a much more complex relationship with women who put the Nation in greater jeopardy than any women who were friends of Kennedy or Clinton. (Fair warning: If you are a women’s rights activist, please stop reading. Otherwise, I will have to wade through all your hate email.)

Obama is no cad; he is, as Arnold Schwarzenegger might say, “a girly man.” He is not strong enough to take a leadership role as President, but insteadlets two women run his life and the country. In this way, the President is a weakling reminiscent of King Edward VIII, the man who doted on Wallis Simpson’s every wish. He is not like President Dwight D. Eisenhower, who had a dalliance with his driver, Capt. Kay Summersby, while he was the Supreme Allied Commander.

I have nothing against women as leaders. I would prefer Hillary Clinton as President to Obama. What I don’t like is a man with responsibility who hides behind the designer dresses of women. And, my friends, this is the man and President that Obama is.

Exhibit A: Valerie Jarrett

Late last year, Richard Minter, a New York Times bestselling writer, released his newest book, Leading From Behind.

The book jacket tells much:

Leading from Behind reveals a president who is indecisive, moody, and often paralyzed by competing political considerations. Many victories–as well as significant failures–during the Obama presidency are revealed to be the work of strong women, who led when the president did not: then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi; Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; and Valerie Jarrett, his closest adviser and an Obama family confidante, whose unusual degree of influence has been a source of conflict with veteran political insiders.

Minter focuses on Jarrett, saying she has a “Rasputin-like” hold over Obama. According to Minter, Jarrett is the kingpin in the Obama Administration and she has misused “her extraordinary access” to the President. Upon further research, I discovered she has full-time Secret Service protection and a staff of nearly three dozen.

Born to American parents and raised for the first five years of her life in Iran, Jarrett shares many of the same principles Obama has regarding the future and diminished role for the United States.

Jarrett is an African-American intellectual who launched the careers of both the first lady and the President beginning in the early 1990s. She influences foreign and domestic policies of the President, from Obamacare to his staunch anti-Israel position.

They are reportedly kindred spirits and, while Jarrett has managed to stay under the liberal media’s radar, Minter’s book has flushed out the truth about this woman:

Jarrett’s White House role is unprecedented. She meets privately with the president at least twice a day with no one else present.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

Like any other socialist dictator, Obama needs government protection for life, but what about Biden, Pelosi, Reid and, of course, Valerie Jarrett?

by Stephen Levine on Sunday, January 13th, 2013

This is article 439 of 523 in the topic Government Spending

I have no problem with paying for the protection of former Presidents.They are national treasures and deserve such protections. Their young children deserve such protections, because like illegal alien children dragged across the border, they had little or nothing to say about their parent’s choices.

I do mind that this type of legislation might be extended to protect Vice Presidents (if you can even name them after five years) and the leaders of Congress. And how about “special people” like Valerie Jarrett who is said to have Secret Service protection even though she is only a presidential advisor?

I do mind the level of protection for former presidents if it amounts to providing for clean-sweeping public venues and blocking streets, airports and other facilities.

And, I have only two questions:

One, can this legislation be repealed or amended so that the United States taxpayer will pay only certain costs over the first two million if the President of the United States has a net worth of at least $10 million dollars and an income over $10 million per year? Or if their Presidential Library/Foundation foundation is worth more than $50 million and they remains an employee.

And two, will this protection be provided for former President Obama in the finest prison on the planet if he has been found to have been constitutionally ineligible to hold the Office of the President of the United States?

Bottom line, this is not too much of a price for Presidents (and their immediate families) who are forced by circumstances to take unpopular actions when protecting the safety and security of the United States. Even hypocrites like Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton who want to disarm and disadvantage America deserve protection from the crazies and criminals.

Now why should we be disarmed and why shouldn’t  “We the People” protect ourselves from the crazies and criminals too! Our guarantee of  safety trumps recently passed or amended legislation – it is the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, which these “protected” Presidents have sworn to protect, preserve and defend.

— steve

Go straight to Post

Petraeus tells the truth: It was terrorism! Did Valerie Jarrett edit the talking points?

by Stephen Levine on Tuesday, November 20th, 2012

This is article 431 of 790 in the topic Terrorism

From today’s close door session …

[Representative Peter] King: Petraeus Said CIA’s Talking Points Were Edited to Play Down Terrorism

Representative Peter King stated that former CIA Director David Petraeus stated that he knew the Benghazi attack was terrorism and that the talking points given to Ambassador Susan Rice were different from the ones prepared by the CIA. Petraeus stated Rice’s talking points were edited to deemphasized the possibility of terrorism. <Source: King: Petraeus Said CIA’s Talking Points Were Edited to Play Down Terrorism | MRCTV>

Bottom line …

We now know that the Obama Administration, ostensibly for political purposes prior to an election, deliberately and repeatedly lied to the American people. And then tried to cover-up their actions.

Was it because they were protecting a CIA operation involving giving heavy weapons confiscated from Gaddafi’s warehouses or purchased from local arms dealers to Turkey for transshipment to Islamic terrorists to use to destabilize Syria and Egypt? To avoid the politically-sensitive comparison to the Mexican gun-walking affair that led to the deaths of at least two Americans and a large number of Mexican nationals?

Was it because it ran counter to the Obama talking points that “We killed Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda is on the run?”

And was the Petraeus sex scandal used to coerce his testimony before Congress? Did he do it voluntarily seeking to save his job? Or was it held over his head?

So many questions about who knew what and when did they know it.

It is time for a House Select Committee Investigation.

— steve

Go straight to Post

Hundreds of generals, admirals and commanders slam Obama

by Jim Kouri on Wednesday, November 7th, 2012

This is article 211 of 303 in the topic US Military

Nearly five hundred former U.S. military commanders, many of them Army, Air Force and Marine generals and Naval admirals, on Monday sponsored a newspaper announcement in the Washington Times that called on their fellow Americans to not allow President Barack Obama a second-term as Commander in Chief.

Most of the 496 signatories are former high-ranking, commanding officers from all branches of the U.S. Armed Forces and yet most of the nation’s major news organizations ignored this unprecedented story.

“The media prefers talking to party hacks who served in the military, but are beholding to Obama and the Democrats such as Gen. Colin Powell and Gen. Wesley Clark. For every retired or serving commanding officer who backs Obama, I can show you 10-to-20 who support Mitt Romney or at least want Obama relieved of his command,” said former Army major and police lieutenant Carl Ray Densen. (See photo above.)

Recently, in an exclusive interview with Law Enforcement Examiner, a former high-ranking Army officer and television news military analyst said that the Barack Obama telling of the Osama bin Laden killing is full of falsehoods and discrepancies geared towards helping to re-elect a failed president.

Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (U.S. Army-Ret.), chairman of the non-profit, non-partisan Stand Up America, told the Examiner that his organization’s research team, led by Scott Winchell, learned that President Barack Obama, contrary to news media tales, wasn’t even aware of the raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan, by Navy SEAL Team Six to either capture or kill al-Qaeda‘s iconic leader Osama Bin Laden on May 1st, 2011. In fact, according to Gen. Vallely and Winchell, Obama found out about the commencement of the operation after the helicopters with SEAL Team Six had crossed into Pakistani airspace.

The SUA analysts allege that the most sophisticated deception techniques were used to make this very dangerous penetration into Pakistan without the knowledge the Pakistani military.

“The President was notified at the golf course and called off the golf course which is why he was sitting in the strange sitting position in the picture that documented the White House operations room event,” notes Gen. Vallely, speaking to the Law Enforcement Examiner via telephone.

According to Gen. Vallely, Winchell and the SUA analysts, Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) Leon Panetta was “the key player who organized and supported this daring raid.”

The SUA report credits Panetta with signing the “Execute Orders” with only a few people aware: Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, Secretary of Defense William Gates, Admiral Bill Mullen and General David Petraeus.

“The White House was closed out of the decision because the President through Valerie Jarrett had turned down two or three other earlier proposals,” the SUA report alleges. “The Deputy of Central Intelligence (DCI) and his covert planning team were extremely frustrated at all the denials, so saw the opportunity slipping away as implausible as it seems.”

Leon Panetta was driven to ensure a successful mission after losing seven CIA officers on Jan. 4, 2010 in Afghanistan when a Jordanian double agent killed the officers.

Panetta convinced his other principals to make the decision that was actually within his authority.

Click to continue reading “Hundreds of generals, admirals and commanders slam Obama”
Go straight to Post

SEAL Team, Osama movies are based on Obama mendacity, say critics

by Jim Kouri on Thursday, November 1st, 2012

This is article 71 of 116 in the topic Hollywood

In a Hollywood Reporter news story by Tim Goodwin on Monday night, readers were told about the two motion pictures that depict the hunt and killing of radical-Islamist icon Osama bin Laden by President Barack Obama and members of the U.S. Navy SEAL Team Six being released. Goodwin mentions Katherine Bigalow’s big screen release Zero Dark Thirty, which will be released after election day, and the National Geographic cable-TV channel’s SEAL Team Six: The Raid on Osama bin Laden scheduled to air at 8 p.m. on Sunday, two days before Election Day.

The NatGeo film comes from The Weinstein Company, a big contributor to the Obama campaign, and is directed by John Stockwell (Into the Blue, Turistas, Crazy/Beautiful) and produced by Nicolas Chartier, who was a producer on The Hurt Locker, Bigelow’s best picture Oscar winner.

The problem for both movie production companies is that their films are based on mendacious claims by a questionable President, according to several knowledgeable sources.

For example, in an exclusive interview with the Law Enforcement Examiner on Oct. 14, 2012, a former high-ranking Army officer and television news military analyst said that the Barack Obama telling of the Osama bin Laden killing is full of falsehoods and discrepancies geared towards helping to re-elect a failed president.

Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (U.S. Army-Ret.), chairman of the non-profit, non-partisan Stand Up America, told the Examiner that his organization’s research team, led by Scott Winchell, learned that President Barack Obama, contrary to news media tales, wasn’t even aware of the raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan, by Navy SEAL Team Six to either capture or kill al-Qaeda’s iconic leader Osama Bin Laden on May 1st, 2011. In fact, according to Gen. Vallely and Winchell, Obama found out about the commencement of the operation after the helicopters with SEAL Team Six had crossed into Pakistani airspace.

The SUA analysts allege that the most sophisticated deception techniques were used to make this very dangerous penetration into Pakistan without Pakistan knowledge.

“The President was notified at the golf course and called off the golf course which is why he was sitting in the strange sitting position in the picture that documented the White House operation room event,” said Gen. Vallely, speaking to Law Enforcement Examiner via telephone.

According to Vallely, Winchell and the SUA analysts, Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) Leon Panetta was “the key player who organized and supported this daring raid.”

The SUA report credits Panetta with signing the order for the SEAL Team to go into Pakistan with only a few people aware: Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, Secretary of Defense William Gates, Admiral Bill Mullen and General David Petraeus.

“The White House was closed out of the decision because the President through Valerie Jarrett had turned down two or three other earlier proposals,” the SUA report alleges. “The Deputy of Central Intelligence (DCI) and his covert planning team were extremely frustrated at all the denials, so saw the opportunity slipping away as implausible as it seems.”

Leon Panetta was driven to ensure a successful mission after losing seven CIA officers on Jan. 4, 2010, in Afghanistan when a Jordanian double agent killed the officers.

“Panetta convinced his other principals to make the decision that was actually within his authority.

Click to continue reading “SEAL Team, Osama movies are based on Obama mendacity, say critics”
Go straight to Post

Obama’s October surprise – exposed by Benghazi?

by Douglas J. Hagmann on Monday, October 29th, 2012

This is article 1170 of 1300 in the topic 2012 Elections

As a veteran investigator, I’ve learned long ago to shed my blinders and look at the larger picture, or look at all of the dots to see if any might connect. In the realm of politics, it also seems reasonable to consider the quote attributed to Joseph Kennedy in 1960: “There are no accidents in politics.” Furthermore, it is important to reconstruct the actions of all suspects, or in this case, elected officials, to determine “motives and means” amid a hefty dose of theatrical diversions that would make an accomplished magician envious.

October surprise

The concept of an “October surprise,” or a news event with significant potential to influence the presidential election arose exactly forty years ago, when former National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger under then President Richard Nixon announced that an end of the Vietnam War was at hand. Applied to the present day, what one comparable announcement could be made that would have the same impact in scope and influence favoring the incumbent Obama. Given all that we know, let’s postulate that it would be an agreement hammered out between Obama and Iran where Iran would agree to halt its nuclear ambitions. That certainly would appear to be an accomplishment worthy of domestic and international praise, in spite of any inherent fragility.

In the shadow of the events in Benghazi, let’s connect a few dots to see where they take us.

The Earl Warren of 2012

Barack Obama promised Americans that he is committed to investigate any intelligence and security failures in Libya. To this end, it was announced in the Federal Register on October 4, 2012 that Thomas Pickering would be the chairman of the U.S. State Department’s Accountability Review Board, a commission charged with investigating the deaths of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans on September 11, 2012 in Benghazi. But who is Thomas Pickering and why was he selected to head the investigation?

Summoning the ghost of Earl Warren, Pickering appears to be a logical choice to select if one were to have an interest in controlling the public disclosure. Pickering, it appears, has quite a cozy history with  Iran as extensively documented by Matthew Vadum in his October 24, 2012 report.

The magic act continues

While the magician on stage activated the theatrical fog and diverted everyone’s attention elsewhere, the activities behind the scenes were in full swing. Concurrent with the appointment of Pickering to throttle the outflow of information about Benghazi, Valerie Jarrett, Obama’s Iranian born Senior Advisor, jetted to the nation of Qatar. Although her activities were concealed by the magician’s accomplice – the dutiful Western media – it was reported by the Asia Times last week that Jarrett met with senior Iranian officials to negotiate a deal pertaining to Iran’s nuclear weapon ambitions.

Talks about any such meetings or potential deal were quickly denied by the White House. What else would one expect, as premature disclosure would certainly ruin the outcome of the magic trick being performed right before our eyes.

Click to continue reading “Obama’s October surprise – exposed by Benghazi?”
Go straight to Post

DID PRESIDENT OBAMA LOSE CONTROL OVER MILITARY OPERATIONS … EVEN IF FOR A SHORT WHILE?

by Stephen Levine on Tuesday, October 16th, 2012

This is article 202 of 303 in the topic US Military

If this story is true, it is deeply disturbing on three important points.

  • One, it suggests that Obama may not be calling the shots when it comes to Muslims and terrorism – and that a close White House Advisor, Valerie Jarrett actually has a veto power on military actions.
  • Two, it suggests that senior White House advisors and cabinet-level officials may have “gone around” presidential procedure authority to authorize a military strike – and present an undeniable “fait accompli” to force Obama’s final authorization.
  • And three, Obama is taking undue credit for being forced into a situation which he may not have authorized if he had been “in the loop.”

Obama Was Golfing While Bin Laden Plan Unfolded Without Him

The Obama Administration has repeatedly spiked the football on President Obama’s “brave call” to order the killing of Osama bin Laden. Given the Administration’s policy of placating enemies, it was the one event that stood out as demonstrating something like an American backbone.

According to a new report, however, the White House’s version of how it all happened is a lie.

Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely has produced a report citing an insider intelligence source that claims the mission to kill bin Laden was hatched and given the go-ahead by Intelligence Director Leon Panetta and other White House staffers who deliberately kept the president out of the loop until the last minute.

According to the report, the reason Panetta, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Adm. Bill Mullen and Gen. David Petraeus went behind the president’s back is because Obama had rejected three previous kill missions on bin Laden earlier in the year.

Panetta was the leader of the subversives and signed off on the final “go” order. Only after the SEALs were committed did anyone go find Obama on the golf course and clue him in. Obama “did not know of the raid in Abbottabad to kill Osama bin Laden on May 1, 2011, until after the helicopters with SEAL Team 6 had crossed into Pakistani airspace,” Vallely wrote.

Are you saying that America committed what could be construed as an “act of war” – entering foreign airspace on a military mission — without the President’s initial approval?

According to the book “Leading From Behind,” Obama’s chief adviser Valerie Jarrett was the person who convinced Obama to reject previous plans to get bin Laden.

The Iranian-born Jarrett is the power behind the throne in the White House. Although her religious affiliation is unknown (the media apparently forgot to ask), she was named Iranian of the Day in 2008 by Iranian.com, and she is the Administration’s voice in meetings with Muslim activists.

By all accounts, Obama doesn’t make a move with Jarrett’s advice. So Jarrett was the primary roadblock to taking out bin Laden, and it was to get around her that Panetta and company kept Obama in the dark.

Given the recent Libya coverup and allegations of Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the Administration, it’s reasonable to ask if Jarrett might not be the Brotherhood’s connection to Obama’s leash. Whether she is or not, one of Obama’s most trumpeted accomplishments, the killing of bin Laden, apparently is just another Administration lie.

Click to continue reading “DID PRESIDENT OBAMA LOSE CONTROL OVER MILITARY OPERATIONS … EVEN IF FOR A SHORT WHILE?”
Go straight to Post

Obama description of Osama killing full of falsehoods, says top general

by Jim Kouri on Monday, October 15th, 2012

This is article 200 of 303 in the topic US Military

In an exclusive interview with Law Enforcement Examiner on Sunday, a former high-ranking Army officer and television news military analyst said that the Barack Obama telling of the Osama bin Laden killing is full of falsehoods and discrepancies geared towards helping to re-elect a failed president.

Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (U.S. Army-Ret.), chairman of the non-profit, non-partisan Stand Up America, tells the Examiner that his organization’s research team, led by Scott Winchell, learned that President Barack Obama, contrary to the news media stories, wasn’t even aware of the raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan, by Navy SEAL Team Six to either capture or kill al-Qaeda‘s iconic leader Osama Bin Laden on May 1st, 2011.

In fact, according to Gen. Vallely and Winchell, Obama found out about the commencement of the operation after the helicopters with SEAL Team Six had crossed into Pakistani airspace.

The SUA analysts allege that the most sophisticated deception techniques were used to make this very dangerous penetration into Pakistan without Pakistan knowledge.

“The President was notified at the golf course and called off the golf course which is why he was sitting in the strange sitting position in the picture that documented the White House operation room event,” notes Gen. Vallely, speaking to the Law Enforcement Examiner via telephone on Sunday afternoon.

According to Vallely, Winchell and the SUA analysts, Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) Leon Panetta was “the key player who organized and supported this daring raid.”

The SUA report credits Panetta with signing the “Execute Orders” with only a few people aware: Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, Secretary of Defense William Gates, Admiral Bill Mullen and General David Petraeus.

“The White House was closed out of the decision because the President through Valerie Jarrett had turned down two or three other earlier proposals,” the SUA report alleges. “The Deputy of Central Intelligence (DCI) and his covert planning team were extremely frustrated at all the denials, so saw the opportunity slipping away as implausible as it seems.”

Leon Panetta was driven to ensure a successful mission after losing seven CIA officers on Jan. 4, 2010 in Afghanistan when a Jordanian double agent killed the officers, the SUA report states.

“Panetta convinced his other principals to make the decision that was actually within his authority. He received their total support, but the President, according to the Vallely’s official, remained clueless on the mission which is allegedly why he appeared so calm at the White House Correspondents Dinner the night before and why he was on the golf course when the helicopters crossed the Afghan-Pakistani borders enroute to bin Laden’s Abbottabad safe house.

“Leon Panetta is the leader who, in fact, made it happen and the intelligence community (IC) professionals. Today, the Intelligence Community’s professionals hold Panetta in high esteem,as do the military in the Pentagon [after Panetta became Defense Secretary]. History will treat him very well once the full story is released and exposed as to the true events,” said Scott Winchell.

During Gen.

Click to continue reading “Obama description of Osama killing full of falsehoods, says top general”
Go straight to Post

Featuring YD Feedwordpress Content Filter Plugin