Posts Tagged ‘military’

World-wide GEOPOLITICS: MILITARY Assessment

by -technician-9842 on Thursday, June 2nd, 2016

Worldwide economic affluence, healthiness, and natural secureness are profoundly afflicted and defined by geography. The train of performance in relation to geographical locales can determine nationwide areas shaping sociable, economical and societal improvement. Geopolitics is, so, the bond between these recent geographical configuration settings with respect to political ability. Geopolitical instruments include things like hemispheres, get and maritime limitations, countries, oceans, and herbal materials. Thinking about the diverse geopolitical disciplines, armed forces, and intercontinental basic safety is among one of its most critical subsets. Ordinary attributes particularly political regulate, national market robustness and societal factors acquire their bases on nation’s comparative armed forces durability. Essentially, armed service policy and durability sorts the cornerstone of geopolitics discovering the worldwide physical fitness of impact and deal with and also interaction in between economic system, customs, while the regional room or space.

The structure associated with the present world wide military services is based on respective states’ armed causes considered as sovereign regarding the purpose of state security. Given that the majority of nations are democracies, their specific army organizations’ heads will be the elected political management who function as both the director in addition to commander in chief. After earth militaries are sovereign, every individual pressure is structured into relatively specialized sectors for admin uses. Man or woman sectors have specialized command instruments with administrator tree branches and control establishments. Present-day armed specialists divisions range from the Navy that manipulate territorial seas, the army managing correct my essay area, together with air flow drive that protects sovereign countries’ airspace. The modern world geopolitics dominance is simply by the most potent military equipment commonly dependent on countries’ general fiscal strong points.

Go straight to Post

, bond, chief, essay, impact, improvement, individual, military, nation, Navy, performance, policy, pressure, purpose, range, space, structure, world, worldwide
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Could Jade Helm be America’s Operation Valkyrie?

by Douglas J. Hagmann on Tuesday, April 21st, 2015

This is article 1 of 1 in the topic Jade Helm

What do you think of when you hear “Valkyrie?” Most Americans will automatically think of the 2008 major film of the same name that depicts the July 20, 1944 assassination plot against Adolph Hitler. That, however, is only part of the story, or the “second half,” of the real Operation Valkyrie that existed in Nazi Germany. As the Jade Helm 15 military “exercises” approach, we need to understand the full scope of Operation Valkyrie through the prism of American history, from Operation Paperclip onward. We need to know true history, and not the revisionist history taught in government schools.

Operation Valkyrie was Nazi Germany’s emergency continuity of government operations plan issued to the Territorial Reserve Army of Germany to execute and implement in case of a general breakdown in the civil order of the nation. Designed by the head of the German Army and approved by Hitler, it was designed to deal with internal disturbances and quell citizen uprisings in emergency situations. A particular threat was the potential uprising of millions of forced laborers working in German factories.

That was the initial purpose and backbone of Operation Valkyrie until it was surreptitiously modified by several high-ranking German Army officers for the purpose of taking Germany back from the Nazi leadership under Hitler after his planned assassination on July 20, 1944. As anyone who knows history or watched the 2008 movie Valkyrie, the assassination plot failed. Accordingly, most people only know half of the story.

Thinking outside of the box now, what if the Jade Helm “exercises” are planned as a preemptive measure to implement the original intent of the Nazi plan Operation Valkyrie?

Many awake and thinking Americans know that there is a seething hatred by our current leadership of proponents of our Constitution, our right to bear arms, our national sovereignty, our Judeo-Christian faith, as well as our heritage and our culture. There has been a notable awakening that poses a threat to the plans, plots and schemes of our leadership who answer not to the American people, but to the interests of a global government.

We stand at the precipice of any number of events that could cause a civil uprising, including a global economic meltdown, a terror attack or series of attacks (either real or false-flag), or even natural disasters. We’ve witnessed the redefinition of “enemies of the state” to real American patriots who present a roadblock to the takeover of our nation by the global elite. Time appears to be running out.

Therefore, would it be inconceivable to consider that Jade Helm 15, or any concurrent or future military “exercises” of this type could be America’s Operation Valkyrie as it was initially drafted and approved by Hitler and the Nazi leadership?

It is imperative that we not only know but understand history. Keep this in mind the next time you see a column of military equipment rolling down Main Street, USA.

Go straight to Post

The Prison Called Cuba

by Alan Caruba on Monday, April 20th, 2015

This is article 70 of 70 in the topic Communism

By Alan Caruba

We are told we need to feel sympathy for the Cuban people who have suffered from a U.S. embargo and lack of diplomatic recognition. That ignores a long history of oppression in Cuba no matter who was in charge.

Prior to Fidel Castro, Cubans were in the grip of Flugencio Batista who overthrew the existing government in September 1933 and then dominated Cuban politics for the next 25 years until Castro’s revolutionary movement took control of the capitol in January 1959.

Fifty-six years ago in 1959, I was about to graduate from the University of Miami and among my friends were young Cubans sent there to get a degree. I have often wondered which among them returned to Cuba and which, like those who could afford it, were joined by their family who fled Cuba.

The U.S. had been involved with Cuba from the end of the Spanish-American War in 1898 when Spain ceded Puerto Rico, the Philippines, and Guam for $20 million. We stayed in Cuba until it was granted independence in 1902 as the Republic of Cuba. Its first president faced an armed revolt in 1906 so we returned to briefly occupy Cuba to restore some stability, but they never really got the hand of being a democratic self-governing nation.

How much better it would have been for the Cubans if the U.S. had decided to make the island a territory like Puerto Rico. Then we could have let the island prosper without having to end up with becoming a Communist nation closely allied, first with the Soviet Union and after its collapse in 1991, with others like China and Venezuela.

The lesson we might be expected to draw from this is that Communism does not work. It is an utterly failed economic and social system that can only stay in power by jailing or executing anyone who resists. That is exactly what the brothers, Fidel and Raul Castro, have done since seizing power. One consistency of the past five decades has been the anti-America policies they have pursued.

The reason given by Obama was that U.S. policies toward Cuba “have not worked” and that it is time for a change. There is some truth in this and it should be noted that Canada has long had good relations with Cuba as have European and, of course, Latin and South American nations.

Even so, what are we to conclude from the report that Russia plans to join military drills with Cuba and North Korea that may also include Vietnam and Brazil? Russia’s aggression in Ukraine has left it sanctioned and isolated, so the military drills send a message that it still has nations friendly to it, but what nations!

Cuba was caught not long ago when it attempted to ship weapons to North Korea, so we are talking about two dedicated Communist nations. Over the years, it has more than demonstrated its anti-American hostility.

Generally, there is little to be gained by exchanging embassies or relieving Cuba. Lifting our embargo and other sanctions leaves the U.S. with even less leverage, if any.

Click to continue reading “The Prison Called Cuba”
Go straight to Post

Let’s Laugh at Islam

by Daniel Greenfield on Friday, January 9th, 2015

This is article 11 of 14 in the topic Islam

Against the assault of laughter nothing can stand” Mark Twain

Anyone who seriously believed after 9/11 that victory against the ongoing Islamic conquest would be accomplished by military force has by now been steadily disabused of that illusion after over a decade of political correctness, passivity and misguided campaigns to bring democracy to the Muslim world.

The war against Islam is not going to be won with guns or bombs. Force is merely the final solution to settling conflicts but Islam’s violence is for now only the tip of the iceberg of a much larger campaign to make the world into an Islamic domain.

While we fight with police actions and holding elections, Islamists are seizing control of governments by force or by democratic elections. They are conquering African nations and staging civil wars in pacific ones. They are importing millions of Muslims to Europe and America as Europe’s ‘Palestinians’ for a coming European Intifada. They are rewriting history to claim that Arab explorers originally discovered America and Australia giving them claim to the land. They are aggressively evangelizing hundreds of thousands a year to convert to Islam through misleading claims and marriages of Western women to Muslim men.

What we believe is a war, is merely a minor skirmish in a global conquest. While we spend billions of dollars and thousands of lives to stabilize a single Muslim country, dozens of non-Muslim countries including our own are being destabilized day by day.

The true war against Islam is not a military war, it is a cultural war. For Islam it is a religious conflict by an empire intent on transforming every aspect of life into one defined by Islam. For us it is about preserving our way of life. The cartoon controversy woke many Europeans to the fact that free speech and many of the other attributes of democracy that they take for granted are incompatible with Islam. Under the relentless pressure of multi-culturalism, they and we are increasingly deciding that our way of life has to bow to theirs.

This is the ultimate victory of Islam. Not the fall of the Twin Towers or any single act of terrorism is as great a victory for Islam as when our own government and press repeat their propaganda and muzzle their critics. This represents the submission of the West to their rule. It turns Islam into the only legally sanctioned religion in Western nations that have long since instituted separations of Church and State.

Islam cannot be criticized by any public figure without violence quickly following. Islam cannot be criticized by the press without violence quickly following. No disrespect, real or perceived, towards Islam can be tolerated either. This is the lesson Muslim violence is teaching in Europe and much of the European and American media, politicians and clergy are becoming quick students. Criticism of Islam by individuals will get you condemned as a bigot by those very same people who are for all intents and purposes collaborating with our new tyrants.

While the entertainers, academics and pundits of a liberalized West are free to criticize and impugn Christianity and Judaism, Islam is a No-Go Zone. While Judaism and Christianity cannot be taught in the schools of a liberalized West, Islam can and is.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

Note that the places Al Queda has discussed attacking in the US are places where few permitted concealed handguns are allowed

by John Lott on Friday, January 9th, 2015

This is article 802 of 804 in the topic Terrorism
From Yahoo News:

Al Qaeda militants in Syria are plotting attacks to inflict mass casualties in the West, possibly against transport systems or “iconic targets”, the head of Britain’s MI5 Security Service said on Thursday.Speaking after gunmen killed 12 people in an assault on a French satirical newspaper, MI5 boss Andrew Parker warned a strike on the United Kingdom was highly likely. . . .

From the Daily Beast:

In the Spring 2014 issue, for example, Inspire proposed attacking cities and military facilities in northern Virginia, the site of the U.S. Open tennis tournament, and targets in Los Angeles and Chicago. . . .

In Los Angeles, there are only about 240 concealed handgun permits in an adult population of about 8 million people.  In Chicago, it costs about $500 to go through the process of getting a concealed handgun permit.

Go straight to Post

St. Louis: Jewelry Store Owner Uses Gun to stop three armed men

by John Lott on Tuesday, December 23rd, 2014

This is article 596 of 603 in the topic Gun Rights
Here is a dramatic story from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch:

. . . Police said there were three men, and that they had entered Robinson Jewelry Co. at 6497 Chippewa Street to rob the store. One man, wearing military fatigues with his face uncovered, waited to be buzzed in, Leyshock said. When he did, he jumped the counter with his arm covering his face. The men were armed with two handguns and a rifle, and one of them smashed a display case, he said.

But the owner somehow escaped from the store, fired his own gun outside, and the men fled. They didn’t escape with any jewelry, police said.

“With the shots fired, they didn’t want to stick around to see what else he was selling,” Leyshock said.

Police said it was not clear if any of the suspects had been shot. Blood was found in the car, but a suspect may have been cut by the shattered display case, Leyshock said. . . . .

Thanks to Tony Troglio for the link.

Go straight to Post

Wars, Past, Present, and Future

by Alan Caruba on Saturday, December 6th, 2014

This is article 90 of 91 in the topic Wars
A ship under attack at Pearl Harbor in 1941
By Alan Caruba
No, Pearl Harbor is not ancient history. It’s part of my history and many others who were alive at the time. I was just an infant, but the Japanese sneak attack on our Hawaii naval base led to early memories of being on trains filled with young soldiers, many of whom did not live to return home.
The attack was on December 7, 1941 and a day later in a speech to Congress, Franklin Delano Roosevelt called it a “date that will live in infamy.” War was declared on Japan and on Germany. Four years later both enemy nations were conquered, largely due to America’s capacity to gear up to provide everything our armed forces needed. It was won, too, because it was a war to protect freedom from authoritarian, anti-Democracy enemies.
A new book, “Blinders, Blunders, and Wars: What America and China Can Learn”, has been published by the Rand Corporation that describes itself as a “research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, health and more prosperous.” It was formed after World War II to connect military planning with research and development decisions. It is an independent, non-profit organization. The study looks at eight strategic blunders.
As David C. Gompert, the lead author of the book and senior fellow at Rand, said, “Leaders who blunder into war tend to have unwarranted confidence in their ability to script the future and control events. They favor information, analysis, and advisors that confirm their beliefs over those that contradict them. In essence, blinders cause blunders.”
While Americans are still debating whether we should have gone to war in Iraq in 2003 or whether our troops should have been withdrawn by 2011, the cold fact of Islamic aggression has seen President Obama reintroduce and increase our “boots on the ground.” Enemies cannot be ignored. At best they can be “contained” until, like the former Soviet Union, they collapse or change in some fashion. Assuming, as our current negotiations with Iran suggest, that they do not harbor extremely dangerous intentions can be fatal.
The authors of the Rand study call Japan’s decision to bomb Pearl Harbor “a blunder of the highest order.” It followed a succession of decisions the Japanese leadership, largely military, had made to invade China and southern Indonesia in the quest to secure the oil and raw materials it needed for its industrial sector. They saw themselves as a people superior to others in Asia and the world. As Herbert Feis, the author of “The Road to Pearl Harbor” wrote, “The Japanese people came to believe that the extension of their control over this vast region was both natural and destined.”
World War II had its roots in the sanctions meted out to Japan and Germany after World War I. In Japan’s case, its invasion of Manchuria in 1931 and China in 1937 put the U.S. on guard and produced sanctions that included halting exports of scrap iron, steel, and aviation fuel, as well as arms, ammunition, and critical raw materials. The U.S.

Click to continue reading “Wars, Past, Present, and Future”
Go straight to Post

Massive flash over Urals in Russia unexplained

by Douglas J. Hagmann on Wednesday, November 19th, 2014

19 November 2014: Remember the Chelyabinsk meteor that reportedly exploded in the statosphere in February 2013? The impact wave from that incident damaged several buildings, blew out thousands of windows, and injured about 1,200 people, a few seriously. On November 14, 2014, a year and a half later, it appears that another similar explosion occurred in the Urals. An extremely bright orange flash lit up the sky in Russia’s Sverdlovsk region in the Urals.

Falling bolide… or something else? We’re keeping our eyes on these incidents based on the military tensions. Read it all at RT HERE – also includes photos and video.

Go straight to Post

China! China! China!

by Alan Caruba on Tuesday, November 11th, 2014

This is article 1251 of 1260 in the topic International
By Alan Caruba
For two days there was the usual news and analysis about President Obama’s summit meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. We are going to hear that China will bump the U.S. from first place among the great economies of the world, challenge us in Asia, and will be the next great global power.
Secretary of State John Kerry recently said that “the U.S.-China relationship is the most consequential in the world today and it will do much to determine the shape of the 21st century.” When a nation has 1.35 billion people it is going to get a fair amount of attention, but that does not mean the current predictions will come true. The reason? Those 1.35 billion people.
There is no denying that China’s rise to become the largest exporter over the past three decades has been impressive. It is expected to become the largest economy and militarily powerful as well, but Peter Zeihan is a geopolitical consultant and author of “The Accidental Superpower” (the U.S., not China) reminds us that the “China mythos is ingrained nowhere more deeply than in the American psyche—the same psyche that was recently convinced of the ‘obvious and inevitable’ rise of the Soviet Union and Japan.”
Both the former Soviet Union—now the Russian Federation—and Japan are in decline for a variety of reasons, but demography, the age of their population, plays a major role. When a nation’s population becomes top heavy with elderly people, but does not have an expanding younger generation, its economy begins to shrink for lack of a labor force.
The other factor that determines a nation’s success is its geography. Zeihan reminds us that “China is a land of failed empires and shattered hopes” and part of its problems stem from the fact that it is really three very distinct geographies in the north, the central region, and the south. They could be separate nations in themselves.
I have always thought that the supreme irony of China is that it adopted a capitalist economic system while remaining politically communist. Why? Because communism doesn’t work and the collapse of the former Soviet Union will be China’s fate as well.
As President Obama meets with President Jinping, both will be doing so with significant domestic problems. Obama’s include the midterm elections that returned power in the Senate, along with the House, to the Republican Party. It is widely interpreted as a massive rejection of the U.S. President, leaving him weakened in the eyes of the world.
As for President Jinping, Zeihan notes that “Even once a Chinese leader succeeds in rising to the top of his local heap—or even commanding the entirety of China—he then must begin the even longer and more painful slop of purging all those who have visions that clash with his own.”
A look at the map and a thought about its huge population would make anyone think it was an economic colossus immune to problems, but the numbers tell another story. “The real surprise of China is that the north, central and south account for just half of China’s 1.35 billion people.

Click to continue reading “China! China! China!”
Go straight to Post

At what point do people have the right to defend themselves: Paul Begala misquotes Joni Ernst and bizarrely misinterprets the rest of her quote

by John Lott on Saturday, October 25th, 2014

This is article 586 of 603 in the topic Gun Rights

Iowa Republican Senate candidate Joni Ernst made this statement in 2012:

“I do believe in the right to carry, and I believe in the right to defend myself and my family — whether it’s from an intruder, or whether it’s from a government, should they decide that my rights are no longer important.”

Paul Begala, always one to misinterpret what someone says when it serves the right political cause, has this comment:

This notion — that the Second Amendment gives citizens the right to fire upon federal officials, or their local police, or sheriffs or even U.S. military personnel — is common among right wingers. But it’s one thing to hear, say, goofball Ted Nugent honk off that way. (The Nuge, by the way, has boasted about how he avoided taking up arms in defense of his country during Vietnam.) It is another to know that someone with those loopy views is one step away from the United States Senate.

The Washington Monthly blogger Ed Kilgore has asked the right question — the one any Iowa voter should be putting to Ms. Ernst: “Since you brought it up, exactly what circumstances would justify you shooting a police officer or a soldier in the head?”

Good question, Ed. Is it OK to do so if, say, the Supreme Court stops the counting of votes so as to give the presidency to the candidate who got fewer votes? I don’t think so.

How about segregation? If ever American citizens were oppressed by their government it was African-Americans under Jim Crow. Thank God we had Dr. King and not Ms. Ernst leading the civil rights movement. . . .

Clearly, with just over a week to go before the election, we have officially entered the political silly season.  First, I should note that Begala misquotes Ernst in a small but very significant way.  Ernst talks about “a government” taking away her rights, not “the government” as Begala claims.  Begala’s misquote makes it appear as if she is referring specifically to our government, when she is obviously referring broadly to governments (including a foreign power).

In any case, Ernst isn’t just talking about one right or even some rights that people have, but all rights.    She didn’t say if the government takes away “one of our rights” or “some of our rights,” but clearly “my rights.”  Presumably, Begala would be upset if Americans tried to fight back against a foreign or domestic totalitarian government that would tried to take away all their rights.  But others would think that it is reasonable.  Begala asks bizarre questions of whether it is OK for us to shot federal officials if they take away segregation.  Seriously? Is this what Begala thinks anyone would define as all their rights?

Go straight to Post

Featuring YD Feedwordpress Content Filter Plugin