Terrorists are constantly changing their tactics to avoid detection and achieve successful operations. Credit: News with Views/Paul Walter
In the award-winning motion picture, “The Hurt Locker,” U.S. military bomb technicians in Iraq come face-to-face with what they termed a “body bomb,” a explosive device surgically placed in the remains of a dead Iraqi. The lead bomb tech discovers the surgically implanted explosives in the hapless young Iraqi’s stomach.
While “The Hurt Locker” is a work of fiction, the concept of body bombs is considered a very real threat to U.S. national security.
On Thursday, U.S. government counterterrorism officials warned American and foreign airlines that terrorists may be planning to surgically implant bombs inside the bodies of airline passengers. The threat brings new meaning to the term “suicide bomber” and “improvised explosive device,” one official told the Law Enforcement Examiner.
Federal officials revealed the warnings on Thursday. “Recent intelligence brought to light the possible terrorist scheme but no specific plot had been uncovered,” according to a press release from the U.S. House of Representatives.
Rep. Peter King (R-NY), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said on Fox News Channel that a bomb implanted in airline passengers is something government security officials have been worried about for “a while.”
“This is a concern about human bombs,” King said. “We believe we’ve informed everyone.”
A U.S. security official told the Law Enforcement Examiner that a body bomb implanted is likely to come from overseas rather than domestically and that precautionary steps have been taken internationally and in the United States to be on guard for such terrorism suspects.
In August 2009, an al-Qaeda suicide bomber, Abdullah Hassan Tali Assiri, attacked and injured Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Nayef with a bomb concealed in a body cavity after passing through two airport scanners, Rep. King said on Fox News.
King and TSA officials would not say if the full-body scanners currently employed at U.S. airports would detect bombs implanted in a human. Also, there are questions as to the vulnerability of these body bombs to radio waves, cell phones or scanners.
Passengers flying from international locations to the United States might notice additional security measures, including additional pat-downs and other physical screening, the TSA said in a press statement.
The TSA stepped up installations of full-body scanners at U.S. airports after the Christmas 2009 attempt to blow up a flight over Detroit by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. Abdulmutallab tried to detonate a bomb concealed in his underwear.
The attempt failed as the jet, carrying 300 people, prepared to land on a flight from Amsterdam.
Coincidentally, GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul of Texas proposed getting rid of the U.S. Transportation Security Administration this week.
In addition to Rep. Ron Paul, Rep. John Mica,a top Republican congressman, on transportation safety and security issues blasted the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) for its federal workforce of airport screeners or Transportation Security Officers (TSOs).
Paul, a veteran U.S. Congressman, joins a growing number of lawmakers and security experts who believe the TSA security officers are no better — perhaps worse — than the private security company guards who worked at the nation’s airports prior to the 9-11 terrorist attacks and the subsequent creation of the Homeland Security Department.
“The press reports are horrifying,” Paul said. “Ninety-five-year-old women humiliated, children molested, disabled people abused.