Archive for the ‘Gay Rights’ Category

Friday Afternoon Roundup – Hope and Fail

by Daniel Greenfield on Sunday, April 13th, 2014



The left does not care about gay marriage. In most left-wing regimes, homosexuality was persecuted. It was illegal in the USSR. Gay men were locked up in Cuba and are still targeted in China. Nicolas Maduro, the current hero of the left, openly uses homophobic language without any criticism from his Western admirers. It goes without saying that homosexuality is criminalized throughout the Muslim world.

Engels viewed homosexuality as a perversion born out of the bourgeois way of life that would be eliminated under socialism. The Revolutionary Communist Party of the United States stated that homosexuality “is a product of the decay of capitalism” and vowed that once the revolution took place, a “struggle will be waged to eliminate it and reform homosexuals.”

The left’s shift on this issue, as on many issues, was purely tactical. The left’s leading lights were racists who jumped into civil rights. They were sexists who became feminists. They were advocates for the working class who despised the idea of working for a living.

The Left Isn’t Pro-Gay — It’s Pro-Power

29 Muslim Terrorists Accidentally Blow Themselves Up


Terrorists and states negotiate differently.  Terrorists escalate a conflict to achieve leverage for their latest demand. They don’t seek a final settlement. There can be no final settlement because that would mean the end of terror.

Arafat and Abbas always negotiated the same way. They arrived prepared to disrupt the negotiating session at a crucial moment. The “peace process” was their hostage and they always hijacked it and began issuing demands.

It’s no surprise that the same thing happened yet again.

Negotiating With Terrorists Doesn’t Work


 “But there were some goods missing, a substantial amount around $75,000 worth and we were unable through our internal investigations and our ongoing dialogs with the DNC to resolve this,” said Taylor, “So, we’re working with our insurance company and the Charlotte police.”

How did that dialogue go?

LG: Give back our TV’s.

DNC: Why are you people so racist?

LG: What? Who said anything about race?

DNC: Homophobes! We are the 99 percent. Your televisions have been occupied by the poor. They were unsustainable. Hope and change.

Democrats Stole $75,000 in TV’s from DNC Convention

Socialist Muslim Politician: “Women who are Raped should be Hanged”

Mulayam Singh Yadav defended rapists saying sometimes boys make mistakes.

In a bid to woo the Muslim voters, Mulayam said: “It is not that I am with the Third Front for some post in the government. In fact, I am with them for the Muslims. If the Third Front comes to power, I would expect from them to solve the problems of the Muslims within a year.”


 Protesters threw tomatoes and shoes at Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s motorcade on Sunday during her first visit to Egypt since the election of Islamist President Mohamed Mursi.

A woman was taken into custody after throwing what she described as a shoe at Hillary Clinton during a Las Vegas speech.

Something About Hillary Inspires People to Throw Shoes at Her

Obama to Spend $1.5 Billion Promoting ObamaCare – Including $52 million spent on celebrity endorsements


While Google Chrome has been struggling with market share, Firefox has been in a steady decline down to 17% market share in March from 20% in May of last year.

1 2 3 4 5 6
Go straight to Post

Gay Intolerance versus Corporate Integrity

by Alan Caruba on Tuesday, April 8th, 2014

This is article 60 of 60 in the topic Gay Rights

I am going to draw on decades of having been a public relations counselor to corporations and other organizations for some thoughts about the resignation of Mozilla’s cofounder, Brendan Eich, after his donation to support a California proposition banning gay marriage six years ago became an issue for the company less than two weeks after he became its CEO.

Despite the passage of the ban, voted upon by a majority (52%) of Californians who believe that marriage should be restricted to the union of a man and a woman, the California Supreme Court ruled against it. Same sex marriages in California resumed after the U.S. Supreme Court restored the federal district court’s ruling that overturned Proposition 8 as unconstitutional. Heeding the will of the people is not the California way.

At the end of 2008, same-sex marriages were legal only in Massachusetts and Connecticut. Today seventeen states, including California, allow such marriages. The gay, lesbian and transgender population of America is about three percent, but they are among the most vocal special interest groups in the nation.

From a PR point of view, Eich’s decision was a very bad one. Other corporations have found themselves targeted by the gay community. Chick-fil-A, an Atlanta based company has opposed gay marriage based on its commitment to Christian values, but most corporations regard any vocal opposition with more fear than courage. It has a lot to do with being in the business of selling products and services as well as being answerable to their investors.

It also explains, for example, why most embrace environmental demands in some fashion, including Big Oil and Big Coal. It’s no accident that BP Oil has a television advertising campaign going these days emphasizing the way drilling for oil in Alaska generates thousands of jobs elsewhere in the nation. The Gulf of Mexico oil spill is fading into the past as well it should. Simply said, accidents happen.

I suspect that Eich’s decision was based in part on the fact that its corporate headquarters are located in San Francisco. A Reuters news article noted that “Gay rights are widely embraced in the San Francisco area” described as “long known for its thriving lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. Silicon Valley’s tech culture reflects that sensitivity and its companies rely on their CEOs to set that kind of tone.”

The curious thing is that Eich’s “views about gay marriage had been known within Mozilla for nearly two years…” His appointment as CEO put him in the limelight and a call for a boycott by OkCupid opened the doors to a decision to stand by his views or leave, presumably in the interest of the company. The company chairwoman, Mitchell Baker, said of his resignation that “you need free speech to fight for equality. Figuring out how to stand for both at the same time can be hard.”

After freedom of religion, free speech is the next one cited in the Constitution’s First Amendment. It’s not hard to stand for it if you have the courage to do so.

Largely unknown to most Americans is the growing matrix of laws at the state level that grant a special status to the GLBT community. This is particularly true in Massachusetts.

Click to continue reading “Gay Intolerance versus Corporate Integrity”
Go straight to Post

Amid insistance that corporations aren’t people, celebration ensues after one guy gets run out of Mozilla

by Doug Powers on Friday, April 4th, 2014

This is article 110 of 110 in the topic Free Speech

Former Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich has resigned (“forced to resign” might be a better way to put it). Why? Some people were angry after it was discovered that in 2008 Eich donated $1,000 to support California’s Prop 8 in favor of traditional marriage. Around the same time Eich cut a check to support Prop 8, many of the people who were this week calling for Eich’s head were energetically campaigning for Barack Obama, who back then held the same view on the issue as Eich.

This is from Mozilla’s explanation about why they not only accepted Eich’s resignation, but more than likely were good enough to write it for him:

Mozilla believes both in equality and freedom of speech. Equality is necessary for meaningful speech. And you need free speech to fight for equality. Figuring out how to stand for both at the same time can be hard.

That’s not exactly a Jeffersonian defense of free speech, and it’s not as if Eich was walking around the office every day handing out pamphlets containing his religious and political views or threatening the jobs of those who disagreed with him (the latter is apparently the board chair’s responsibility).

It’s been asked if atheist CEOs should be forced out if their opinion offends religious employees. The Mozilla “free speech” test would probably bring about the answer, “if the religious employees are opposed to gay marriage, then no.”

The real Eich dilemma for those whose protest and boycott had a hand in getting him run out of Mozilla is this: Eich created JavaScript, which, in spite of Eich’s Prop 8 support six years ago, is still in use — on Al Gore’s progressive Internet. OkCupid, the dating site that played a part in Eich’s exit from Mozilla, runs on JavaScript. Every time a couple hooks up, Brendan Eich gets a dollar. Sleep well, OkCupid!

Go straight to Post

Friday Afternoon Roundup – The Voices They Hear

by Daniel Greenfield on Saturday, March 22nd, 2014


Progressives Summarized


There is no Obama administration. There is an Obama campaign. And that campaign is part of an organization built around a single figure; Obama Inc.

Obama Inc. has more in common with the type of organization built around a celebrity like Beyonce than a conventional political organization. It can handle everything from fundraising, branding to viral marketing, but like the inner circles of top celebrities, the most influential person in the organization is the one who can soothe, pamper and cater to the celebrity’s mercurial personality.

Valerie Jarrett’s role as CEO of Obama Inc. confuses those who expect a more conventional arrangement. Jarrett is less Dick Cheney and more Colonel Parker or Helen Kushnick; a powerful enigmatic figure ruthlessly dedicated to her star whose power comes from his dependency.

Valerie Jarrett, the CEO of Obama Inc.

Muslims: Halal Lunches in School are a Constitutional Right


Car salesmen get to stay on the lot. Obama has become a door-to-door insurance salesman. His appearance on “Between Two Ferns” was humiliating not because the leader of the free world was taking part in a lame comedy routine, but because Obama was doing it to sell a product. Presidents have gone on Leno, Letterman and Saturday Night Live, but they have never sat awkwardly cracking jokes in the hopes that a few young people would stop by their website and bail them out by buying some of what they’re selling.

The Insurance Salesman-in-Chief

“F___ you, Mr. President, you piece of s___t used-car salesman.  From my heart and soul, f___ you.”

ObamaCare Defender Forced to Try ObamaCare.


Only 1% want her because she would be “good for the common people”. 2% fantasize that she’ll help with the economy.  1% hope she’ll “end the wars”.

Only 5% of Americans Want Hillary as the “Best Choice” for President

New York Times on Mitt Romney: “Just Plain Bossy”

American Power Under Obama in 1 Photo

Minneapolis Lesbian Police Chief Dons Hijab for “Hijab Day”


Phelps did more than anyone to make opposition to homosexuality seem as toxic as possible by picketing the funerals of soldiers with anti-gay slogans. There probably wasn’t a more inspired way to make anti-gay sentiments seem as unacceptable as possible.

If the Phelps clan had deliberately set out to implement gay marriage in America, they could not have chosen a better method and who is to say that they didn’t.

Fred Phelps: The Unsung Hero of the Gay Rights Movement

Ukraine Asks for Military Aid, Obama Offers MREs


Last spring, Oberlin College canceled classes after claims that someone dressed in a KKK robe was seen walking outside. It apparently turned out to be a woman in a blanket.

Oberlin College has published an official document on triggers, advising faculty members to “be aware of racism, classism, sexism, heterosexism, cissexism, ableism, and other issues of privilege and oppression,”

But Oberlin, which is affiliated with CAIR, does overlook some far more serious threats when they come from Muslims.

1 2 3 4
Go straight to Post

America: Plunging Headlong into Reprobation?

by Rev. Michael Bresciani on Thursday, March 20th, 2014

This is article 38 of 38 in the topic Moral Values

The dictionary definition pales against the Biblical definition of reprobation. The Bible says God gives men over to a state of reprobation, as we collectively approach the last days of time before the second coming of Christ. The definition given in Romans 1: 28 is one of the most frightening prophetic statements in all of scripture.

Speaking of conditions preceding the last days the Apostle Paul declared, “And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient”

The phrase ‘God gave them over’ is enough to make us shudder when considering that if God gives us up, redemption and any chance of recovery is literally impossible.

The most basic sense of reprobation in the bible refers to something far more than simple immorality, it is the inability to hear, understand and implement any truth or morality. Right and wrong are impossible to discern with a reprobate mind.

Oddly, most dictionary definitions include a rendering of the word that clearly indicates that people don’t just fall into reprobation, but they willfully labor to get into this state.

Often words like: ban, forbid, prohibit, rebuff, repel, spurn, check, constrain, curb, repress, restrain, restrict; balk (at), hinder, impede, obstruct are also included as synonyms. But, what is being impeded, or obstructed by the collective minds and hearts of the last day’s crowd?

In the simplest terms, all that pertains to God, righteousness and basic morality is shunned in an atmosphere of self-indulgence and lawlessness.

Before reprobation sets in on a generation, they may be found acknowledging and repenting of their sins. After reprobation begins to take root, they are found affirming and celebrating their sins.

Now, anyone calling out the sin seems like a hater of the sinner. The lawless then turn to the law to force acceptance of their lawlessness, it is a vicious cycle that leads to destruction.

If you want to lust for those of your own gender you must be protected by the law to do so and even the idea of someone counseling you to avoid the temptation must be silenced. Several states have adopted laws to stop counseling to change the minds of younsters who are inclined toward their own sex.

The laws of God has been sidestepped by popular trends, PC notions of diversity and the ‘new morality’ which is only amorality (disregard of all morality) passing itself off under a new name.

Changing the laws is a means of changing definitions to fit the new drive for life with no borders or parameters to define good and evil.

When all of this reaches its peak we will be ready for the world’s last dictator. A ruler long prophesied to come in the last days. He will be called the “lawless one” (2Thess 2: 8 NAS) according to the Apostle Paul.

A ruler who lives without laws may seem like the perfect non-sequitur until it is revealed that the antichrist changes the laws to fit his own view of right and wrong. Being the incarnation of the Devil himself means that his view is always the exact opposite of Gods and is always wrong. A perfect type of the antichrist is Barack Obama.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

Killing Christianity with Sex

by Selwyn Duke on Sunday, March 16th, 2014

This is article 231 of 235 in the topic Religion

1746135_lowIn recent times, there has been a development quite odd and unprecedented in the annals of the sexual “revolution.” When America’s traditional sexual mores started to break down, it always took the form of slouching toward “tolerance.” For example, consider fornication. Two unmarried opposite-sex individuals cohabitating was once known as “living in sin” and was not something any couple could do in their community. But as pedophile Alfred Kinsey’s fraudulent science and the phenomenon whereby, as Confucius said, no one likes “virtue as much as sex” eroded moral barriers, this started to change. And then one thing led to another, people did their thing, and, over time, tolerance resulted as a matter of course (I’m not implying this is a good thing).

Now, notable here — notable only because of the aforementioned development — is that fornicators never called for government benefits; they never beat the drum for civil unions. They never started lobbying groups. And the worst those objecting to their practices were called was prudes or Puritans; no one ever thought to brand them bigots or make “Forniphobe” a repeated-to-staleness neologism. And, of course, anyone who hasn’t been asleep for the last 20 years knows exactly what I’m analogizing here.

This brings me to an article in The Week by Damon Linker. He writes that while he supports faux marriage, he is also troubled by the equally stunning lack of charity, magnanimity, and tolerance displayed by many gay marriage advocates.

They don’t just want most Americans to recognize and affirm the equal dignity of their relationships. They appear to want and expect all Americans to recognize and affirm that equal dignity, under penalty of ostracism from civilized life.

That is an unacceptable, illiberal demand.

Linker’s surprise indicates that he doesn’t know his fellow leftists very well. He also then, by complaining that he isn’t happy with the “sloppy way the most strident gay-marriage proponents have been throwing around the term ‘bigotry,’” reveals his status: nice useful idiot. There are only two other categories of leftists, by the way, and they constitute the majority of the passionate. One would be the users.

The other group is mean useful idiots.

Speaking of which, there are only two reasons why the homosexual lobby spews the bigot charge.

One is hatred.

Disparaging another with damaging names not even remotely correlative to what the person is, and thus not the product of reason, is an emotion-driven practice. And that emotion isn’t love. It is a deep-seated animosity driving one to want to hurt his target with “verbal violence,” which, though I reject the designation in law and social code, would make it “hate speech.”

The second reason the bigot label is applied is simple.

It works.

It’s a rhetorical device used to silence opposition.

This is why Barack Obama was never called a bigot, even though he opposed faux marriage less than two years ago. You see, homosexual activists didn’t hate Obama. They also knew something: Obama’s upholding of marriage was poorly acted political theater (note that, as a supporter of faux marriage in 1996, Obama was for it before he was against it before he was for it). It was always clear he would atavistically “evolve” as the culture devolved.

Speaking of cultural devolution brings us to my main point. G.K.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

Friday Afternoon Roundup – Appropriate My Culture, Please

by Daniel Greenfield on Friday, March 14th, 2014


At his inaugural address, Obama had declared, “the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve”, “as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself” and “America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.”

The new era of peace was not to come. That same spring, his Cairo speech with its abandonment of American power and alliances would devolve the Middle East into murderous civil wars fought over lines of tribe and Islamist regimes rejecting common humanity with non-Muslims and even fellow Muslims.

In Iraq, as in Ukraine and Syria, the lines of tribe held and common humanity was nowhere in sight.

Obama’s Appeasement Leads to War


The denunciations of cultural appropriation never work in reverse. No one is going to complain when Egyptian writers plagiarize French novels or half the world churns out even worse imitations of truly terrible American pop music. Katy Perry wearing a Kimono is a hate crime, but the Rockabilly dancers in leather jackets and poodle skirts twirling in Toyko’s Harajuku Park aren’t going to face condemnation.

It is particularly ironic that Jarrar, a woman from a culture which comfortably pilfered math from the Indians, religion from the Jews and science from the Greeks is insisting that belly dancing should be the private property of her culture. If every culture that contributed to the Arab world got to call in its chits the same way, Randa Jarrar and her compatriots wouldn’t have a whole lot left except belly dancing.

And maybe not even that. It is entirely possible that belly dancing actually originated in India. In that case, it’s Randa Jarrar who is the cultural appropriationist.

The Left’s Fantasies of Cultural Ghettos


I did an interview with Jamie Glazov on the Glazov Gang last week and you can catch it here.

FDR to Stalin: “I Would Give Saudi King 6 Million Jews


…from the comments

Jimmie the Greek •

False hate crimes are alleged in order to cause fear of violence in the minds of minorities. That means they are not “false” hate crimes, they are quite intentional hate crimes. They are intended to terrorize an ethnic, racial or gender group, and they clearly do that.

It may be that the perpetrators of these “false” hate crimes hope the ULTIMATE outcome will be positive (i.e. more rallies, greater hate crime penalties, more white guilt, more hetero shame, etc.) but they are achieving those goals by terroristic means–not by terrorizing the “guilty” people (i..e. whites, Christians, heaters) but by terrorizing the very minorities they say they love.

They should be punished for terrorism/hate. Whatever their ultimate goals are should not matter.

Another Day, Another Fake Anti-Gay Hate Crime

Obama Makes it Easier for Syrians, Harder for Israelis to Enter US

THE KOCH BROTHERS STOLE HARRY REID’S PANTS  – Harry Reid Claims Koch Brothers Endangering the Ukraine


There’s nothing like a lesbian feminist authority figure who boasts of being the first female police chief in Minneapolis donning a symbol of male ownership in a patriarchal tribal society to express the deep schizophrenia of the left in its enthusiastic enabling of Islamists.

1 2 3 4 5
Go straight to Post

A Once Free Nation

by Bob Livingston on Tuesday, February 25th, 2014

This is article 416 of 428 in the topic Government Corruption
A Once Free Nation


A once free nation’s descent into tyranny occurs one of two ways: either through sudden violent revolution or gradually over decades in fits and starts. America’s has occurred gradually.

Government conquers its citizens with gradualism because few understand it. Gradualism is imperceptible force.

America has evolved into a lawless state. There has been a breakdown of law and order, but only a few can see it. There are many layers of deception and those few who have become alerted see and understand at different levels.

The first trigger of alert is when a few people come to understand that government is organized crime and that government is in all-out war with its own citizens. The central purpose of Personal Liberty Digest™ is to raise the awareness of the people.

The U.S. Congress has, gradually, ceded its authority to the President and to the alphabet soup agencies of government that it created or allowed the President to create. Now the President rewrites laws on a whim, or chooses to not enforce them on a whim. This is the stuff of third-world banana republics. The imperial presidency feared by the Founding Fathers is in full operation. Yet the feckless Congress hardly whimpers about it and the people do little more than shrug their collective shoulders.

Even worse are the regulatory and quasi-military law enforcement agencies. These agencies, staffed by career bureaucrats and headed by statists with “altruistic” motives that always benefit either the cronies and well-connected or the growing government apparatus, create new standards and new regulations and new rules without regard to the Constitution and their effect on the American people.

Often the elites simply do not care how their policies will affect average Americans so long as the fascist system is rewarded or the State is made more powerful. Other times the detrimental effects are simply chalked up as unintended consequences or collateral damage.

Almost any crime can be carried out without overt force or resistance if it is done gradually. Somehow any process of gradualism escapes detection. Gradualism extends false hope and the illusion of reality.

One can poison himself and be dead immediately. On the other hand, we can be poisoned over time with fluoride in our drinking water, by vaccinations and inoculations, by toxins in our foods, and so on ad infinitum.

Gradualism does something else. It confuses cause and effect. As long as a process of currency depreciation is gradual, the people cannot discern the cause nor place the blame on the money printers.

Currency debasement has throughout history always been the method of choice of governments to steal and transfer wealth from the people to the government in subtle and secret ways so that the crowd never catches on.

This is going on now in our lifetime more than at any time in history. Yet there is no revolution. There is no blood in the streets. The propaganda still holds sway. The people still trust the system. The people remain calm.

Not only are the peasants calm, they have been deceived into believing that rising stock markets constitute a sign of prosperity.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

Does homosexuality bring judgment? – Prophecies of the future say yes

by Rev. Michael Bresciani on Sunday, February 16th, 2014

This is article 59 of 60 in the topic Gay Rights

coming-to-a-neighborhood-near-you-2.jpgAsk any pop-culture minion of today, or a Hollywood celebrity this question and you will not only get a very emphatic no, but you might see someone cringe and begin to accuse you of being a flaming homophobe.

The proof that homosexuality and now, the justifications to support it have become perverted is found in a headline contained in Irelands that says “Homophobia ‘insults God’, says Archbishop of Dublin.”

In fact the bible this Archbishop should be reading says exactly the opposite. Homosexuality is an insult to God not homophobia. But the very word ‘homophobia’ has run its course and is now being used by devils themselves to justify anything that comes to the minds of fallen men and women. It is a word so overused it is now being abused as a prop for the prurient, pathetic and pathological perverts of the last days.

The new ‘phobophobes’ – Not everyone has drunk the Kool Aid

The justifications for the rise in the homosexual lifestyle have become so acrid that the very term ‘homophobic, is worn out and is quite ready for a re-tread, or even better – a discard.

We are now approaching the peak in pop-culture indoctrination by the LGBT and now, what was once used to explain the cause of someone’s disagreement with a lifestyle has become an indicator of an entirely different thing, even without reference to the Bible.

Succinctly, now, because of the overuse of the term, to be labeled a homophobe doesn’t mean you are afraid of homosexuals or homosexuality it now means; you are not afraid of homosexuality – at all. It means you stand with a view that you need not back down from, realizing that by whatever criterion you have made your decision, you have as much right to hold your view as any opposing view.

Shame, guilt and fear need not be part of a well-founded and defensible alternate view regardless of how un-popular it may be. You may not like eggs, but no one has the right to call you an eggophobe. If you don’t care to have your house burglarized are you a burglarphobe? Where does this nonsense end? Political activists have no special set of rights to categorize you into any pigeon hole based on your preferences, viewpoints or fundamental beliefs.

If we choose to take our position on homosexuality from the bible; now the entire picture changes. Now, we have stepped up a notch from constitutional rights to a higher code of conduct derived from a higher authority. Here, we must recognize that if LGBT doesn’t recognize our constitutional first amendment rights, then our biblical view will not be regarded either – so what!

Would it be productive to start calling those who balk at our viewpoint – Christophobes or biblephobes? Would it be more honest, to look at their arguments as, pure, socially crafted, last days pop-culture nonsense – or in the very simplest of terms – pure baloney?

Twisted laws, pop-culture acceptance and the LGBT agenda still do not trump the Bible

Acceptance of the LGBT agenda depends on low information sheep being fed lies and a constant barrage of pop-culture color and confusion.  It is aided by the pack of jackals known as Hollywood celebrities, apostate clergy, political philanderers and constitutional cop-outs.

1 2 3 4
Go straight to Post

Friday Afternoon Roundup – Snowed Under

by Daniel Greenfield on Saturday, February 15th, 2014

from The People’s Cube

The David Horowitz Freedom Center has assembled an ebook with some of my best articles from last year that have appeared at Front Page Magazine that they are making available to contributors.

As readers of, you have become very familiar with the work of the incredibly prolific and brilliant writer, Daniel Greenfield. His lead articles and his daily blog, The Point, have propelled FrontPage traffic three fold in the last year.

Daniel exposed the terrorist fundraising past of a vice president at the Soros-financed Center for American Progress who became Nancy Pelosi’s senior advisor. He broke the stories of how Barack Obama freed violent repeat offender crack dealers and how New York’s radical mayor, Bill de Blasio, appointed Al Sharpton’s tax fraud lawyer as chief attorney for the city right after his election.

He has exposed the Hamas sympathies of the head of the Syrian Emergency Task Force, a key group close to senators and congressmen pushing for U.S. intervention in Syria.

Think about this partial table of contents and you’ll understand why Daniel is regarded as one of the most talented young internet journalists in the country and why opinion makers everywhere open FrontPage first thing in the morning to see what he has uncovered.

FrontPage is already very strong with regular contributors such as Caroline Glick, Bruce Bawer, Ben Shapiro, Robert Spencer, Raymond Ibrahim. But Daniel has become the jewel in the crown. In large part because of his relentless ability to turn over the rocks where the left hides its nasty agenda, FrontPage traffic is growing every day.

But because our job is defending America and attacking the Left—which amount to two side of the same coin—we need to grow larger and increase our impact. FrontPage lives solely on the generosity of readers such as you. The average donation to FrontPage is $27, so believe me when I tell, every dollar, and every donation, is huge to us.

As one of our loyal readers, I want to make a very special offer to you for our new E-Book, Daniel Greenfield’s Getting The Point. This downloadable E-Book will include a selection of Daniel’s most influential articles from the past year and can be yours for a donation of just $25 or more.

Please follow this link to make your tax-deductible donation today.

Your donation will enable us to get FrontPage, and more specially, the writings of Daniel Greenfield to a much wider audience. If the machinations of the jihadis abroad and the left here at home is the problem, Daniel is part of the solution.

I thank you for your readership, your trust and faith in our cause and hope you can help us again.

David Horowitz
President & Founder


If the left’s foreign policy these days had a slogan, it would be, “Boycott Israel, not Iran.” The double standard, dishonest as it is ugly, is also the motto of Obama’s foreign policy, which benevolently blesses Iran’s nuclear program with one outstretched hand in the name of peace and chokes concessions out of Israel to the terrorists with the other also in the name of peace.

Both peace plans are going disastrously according to plan.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Go straight to Post