Archive for the ‘Anti-Americanism’ Category

Obama provoking American rebellion, say governor and policy expert

by Jim Kouri on Monday, June 30th, 2014

This is article 2 of 2 in the topic Civil War

It’s quite possible that President Barack Obama and his administration’s minions are provoking many Americans to stage an actual rebellion, former NRA editor and leading weapons policy maven, John Snyder told the Examiner on Thursday. In addition, Snyder points out that Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal also accused President Obama and other Democrats of waging war against religious liberty and education and said that a rebellion is brewing in the U.S. with people ready for “a hostile takeover” of the nation’s capital.

“Is President Obama provoking rebellion? It’s quite possible he is,” Snyder said. ” [And] that seems to be the opinion ofGov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana and others, as well.”

Gov. Jindal is quoted by Fox News as saying he could “sense right now a rebellion brewing amongst these United States where people are ready for a hostile takeover of Washington, D.C., to preserve the American dream for our children and grandchildren.”

Gov. Jindal spoke in Washington, D.C, at the annual Faith and Freedom Coalition conference. During his presentation he accused Obama, his minions and sycophants of waging war against certain American values. “The Pelican State governor is right on,” said Snyder, who is also on the board of advisers for the National Association of Chiefs of Police.

“As a matter of fact, America should be ashamed of the Obama presidency,” he added.

Obama had stated earlier at the White House that America — meaning the American people — should be ashamed that more gun control laws never materialized after some high-profile killing sprees.

“In reality,” Snyder retorted, “Obama, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California and their supporters try to argue for gun control as necessary for crime control, although studies indicate gun control does not have a positive impact on crime control.”

“What they really want to do is undermine the right and ability of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves and others from criminal violence [or worse],” he said.

Snyder claims that gun control is merely one of the issues in which the Obama White House manifested its absurdity. “All are clear examples of absurd government activity becoming normal for government officials. What this means is that government itself will lose legitimacy, if it [hasn’t] already. This in turn could lead to the hostile takeover of Washington, D.C. predicted by Gov. Bobby Jindal,” Snyder warned.

“I can sense right now a rebellion brewing amongst these United States,” Jindal said atRalph Reed’s Faith and Freedom Coalition conference. “People are ready for a hostile takeover of Washington, D.C., to preserve the American Dream for our children and grandchildren.”

Go straight to Post

Grading Barack: The Wrath of F!

by John Lillpop on Sunday, January 19th, 2014

This is article 957 of 1015 in the topic Obama

By any measure, the presidency of Barack Obama has been a tragic failure, a major set-back to the lofty notion of American Exceptionalism.

Suffice it to say, if America had been foolish enough to elect (and re-elect) Barack Obama earlier in our history, America would today be a fascist dictatorship operating under Sharia Law where the Rule of Law would not exist; where Congress would be outlawed; where all wealth would be the sole and separate property of the dictator state; where individual rights would be the butt of late-night comics; where income equality would mean poverty for all; where religious freedom would be limited to state-licensed “Barack Is The One” worship centers; where the state of Israel would be public enemy # 1 and Muslim nations would be the strongest US allies; where “illegal aliens” would be white southerners with the audacity to have been born on US soil; where controlling spending and the deficit would be considered terrorist acts perpetrated by racist white people to harm people of color.

Had Barack Obama been elected, say, 200 years earlier, in 1808, America would have lost the War of 1812, the US-Mexico war, the Civil war, World Wars, 1 and 11, the Korean War, and all subsequent skirmishes; the US military would be a haven for “girly” men where push ups would be considered ‘cruel and unusual punishment,’ and thus, outlawed; the national language would alternate between Spanish, Mexican, Chinese, and Arabic, and where truth and veracity would be seen as ‘old school’ foolishness.

The motto of the US Marines would be ‘Surrender Works: It May Save Your Life!,’ and where birds, dogs, cats, chickens, fish and all domesticated (partially or fully) would be covered under a universal Single Payer health care plan.

Simply put, if Barack had arrived on the America political scene earlier, there would be no America to worry about in 2014.

An objective assessment of specific areas of the Obama presidency through 2013 yields failing marks for the following:

  • Overall Direction of Nation:
  • Foreign Affairs:
  • Relations with Allies:
  • War on Terrorism:
  • Advocacy of Individual Rights:
  • Economic Growth, Stability:
  • Transparency:
  • Control of Borders, Illegals:
  • Deficit Reduction:
  • Ability to Work With Congress:
  • Unemployment:
  • Adherence to Rule of Law:
  • Defense of Constitution, & Bill of Rights:
  • Global Climate Policy:
  • US Energy Policy:
  • Moral Leadership:
  • War and Peace:
  • Women’s Issues:
  • Racial Relations:
  • Healthcare Legislation, Implementation:
  • Role Model for Youth:

Only when it comes to total devastation of the American spirit does Barack escape the wrath of F. In this regard, The One earns an “Incomplete!”

Let’s make sure he does NOT complete this item, shall we?

John W. Lillpop
San Jose, California

Go straight to Post


by Stephen Levine on Sunday, December 15th, 2013

This is article 946 of 1015 in the topic Obama

It is almost unconceivable that the President of the United States and his cadre of progressive socialist democrats could be the culmination of a decades-long effort of a foreign sovereign nation with a toxic socialist/communist ideology to purchase and/or coerce political influence within the United States. But, then again, reviewing the actions of the President and the present Administration, how many other explanations can possibly exist: total and utter incompetence, an historic confluence of corruption, or simply a detached President who has ceded the power of the presidency to lower-level advisors and bureaucrats as he took the bows? How can you explain a Nobel Peace Prize awarded to a man with zero foreign policy accomplishments? Or the adoration of a progressive mainstream media that refuses to tell the truth about President Obama?

How can the American people believe the mainstream media after its historic and epic failure to vet the President of the United States? What other candidate for high public office would see his background credentials and basic eligibility documents sealed – and defended from public scrutiny involving the expenditure of millions of dollars in legal expenses? What other candidate has openly associated, feted, and employed socialists and communists? Or, for that matter, associated with domestic terrorists who tried to overthrow the government of the United States?

President Obama may have “historic” credentials that are far beyond being the first black man in the Presidency, he may truly be the Manchurian Candidate – a man groomed by socialists and communists to take office and attack the United States from within. Impossible you say? One need only consider that President Obama’s TelePrompTered words and actions are often diametrically opposed. Obama appears to have no fear when it comes to standing before America and lying to American citizens. Obama appears to have no fear when it comes to stonewalling legitimate Congressional inquiries and running-out the clock on the pursuit and prosecution of wrongdoing. How many times has Obama stood before America and pointed the finger at someone else – throwing them under the proverbial bus – while claiming that he is shocked, shocked I tell you, that such perfidy could exist in his Administration. Claiming that he received the news from the media, in spite of the extensive daily briefings by government personnel. Claiming that he will investigate and fix the vexatious problem, although he has yet to resolve any of the more serious scandals threatening our democratic and representative republic.

How can this be? How can President Obama exhibit plausible deniability and avoid being impeached? Could it be that his minions are acting on his behalf, conditioned by decades of political correctness and socialist indoctrination – to the point where President Obama does not need to issue an overt order because the minions can anticipate and act on what they believe President Obama would want in the pursuit of his progressive socialist democrat ideology?

A point that appears more and more plausible as we consider this book review from Alan Caruba, a man who is not only a journalist and an astute observer of the political scene, but an accomplished book reviewer who has mastered his craft.

1 2 3 4
Go straight to Post

The President Who Kicked The Hornet’s Nest

by John Myers on Wednesday, October 16th, 2013

This is article 919 of 1015 in the topic Obama
The President Who Kicked The Hornet’s Nest


“Don’t call me crazy. I’m a survivor. I do what I have to do to survive.” — From the novel The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest

President Barack Obama has done more to inspire ill will against the United States than any President in history. Perhaps it is because he is so lacking in charisma. Perhaps it is because he continues to intervene in the Mideast with helter-skelter policies. Most likely it is because of the tangible disappointment that has followed in the wake of his Presidency, which has left hundreds of millions of people questioning whether America is a desperate and crumbling empire.

It is Obama, the Nobel Peace Prize winner who has overseen an unmitigated disaster in the Mideast. It is Obama, the President who bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia and who has been an apologist for Islam, even as he has tripled down on America’s use of killer drones. And it is Obama, who was hell-bent on war with Syria one week and then the next week did diplomatic somersaults to please Iranian President Hassan Rouhani.

So far, Obama’s charm is not spilling over after his 15-minute phone call to Rouhani. Reportedly, Rouhani’s administration wants to eliminate the “Death to America” chant from at least from official ceremonies, but faces opposition from the public.

It seems strange that Obama is open to negotiations with Islamic terrorists who hate America but refuses to negotiate with Republicans who love America. It almost seems downright un-American.

But I have to defend Obama on one point: He is consistent. It is not just millions of Americans who despise him because of his domestic policies. (What policy besides Obamacare?) It is also hundreds of millions of people around the world who despise him and, therefore, America because of his schizophrenia: his Kenyan-taught anti-Colonial sympathies that strangely coexist with his Pax Americana ambitions shared with neoconservatives.

On Oct. 11, Global Research reported:

Obama’s rhetorical exercise in “peace talk” at the United Nations General Assembly impressed few delegations and even fewer Americans: Far more eloquent are his five years of wars, military interventions, cyber-spying, drone murders, military coups and the merciless prosecution of patriotic truth tellers.

If his “peace message” fell flat, the explicit affirmations of imperial prerogatives, threats of military interventions and over two dozen (25) references to Israel as a “strategic ally,” confirmed the suspicions and fears that Obama was preparing for even more deadly wars.

The headline is revealing: “Obama’s Double Discourse: Talking Peace While Making War.”

In March, Gallup World reported that America’s image under Obama has consistently fallen since he was first sworn into office. Gallup’s poll concluded that even in Africa, where U.S. leadership enjoyed the most support, the number of people who disapprove of American leadership almost doubled between 2009 and 2012, from 11 percent to 19 percent.

Multitudes around the world hate Obama and, thus, America because the President falsely represented his objectives when he claimed that he wanted to cement peace around the world.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

New York lawmaker bashes Al Jazeera as Islamist ‘propaganda

by Jim Kouri on Tuesday, August 27th, 2013

This is article 493 of 577 in the topic Media

A New York State lawmaker and Iraq veteran on Monday urged several cable and satellite television distributors to stop broadcasting programing from the Middle East media giant Al Jazeera calling their news coverage “propaganda.”

New York State Assemblyman Kieran Michael Lalor, a conservative Republican who served as a U.S. Marine officer during Operation Iraqi Freedom, has contacted company’s such as Time-Warner, Verizon, Comcast, Direct TV and Dish TV Network by letter alleging that Al Jazeera is “notoriously anti-American, anti-Semitic and misogynistic.” He’s demanding that they drop the Qatar-based television network from their basic cable packages.

“Whether the customers watch Al Jazeera America programming or they are offended by its news coverage and broadcasts, they are paying to support its broadcasts in the United States through their service charges,” said another former Marine, Detective Mike Snopes.

“Leave it to Al “the sky is falling” Gore to sell his broadcasting fiasco, Current TV, to a foreign interest with anti-American tendencies,” said Snopes.

Snopes is referring to Al Jazeera purchasing Current TV, from former Vice President Al Gore, to use it as a distribution network. It began broadcasting on August 20.

Assemblyman Lalor is urging customers to boycott any television providers that carry Al Jazeera and refused to drop drop it by Sept. 11, 2013.

Lalor noted that he will be holding press conferences later this week to discuss his battle against Al Jazeera America.

In a statement on Monday, Lalor said:

Al Jazeera is the anti-American, anti-Semitic, misogynistic propaganda wing of a foreign government. The network has celebrated brutal terrorists and ‘reported’ as fact anti-Semitic 9/11 truther conspiracy theories. American TV viewers shouldn’t have to subsidize Al Jazeera through a part of their basic cable bill. As a veteran who served in Iraq and a New Yorker I’m outraged that my television provider is charging me to have this propaganda piped into my home. These television providers need to drop Al Jazeera from their basic cable packages. If they don’t, I’ll be proud to lead a boycott until they do. I’ll also encourage municipalities to revoke the monopolies the companies currently enjoy.

To be clear, this is not a First Amendment issue. The free press clause of the First Amendment does not protect foreign powers who wish to broadcast propaganda into our country and our homes. Moreover, at this time my constituents and I are not objecting to the existence of the channel. We object to Al Jazeera America’s inclusion as a basic cable channel that subscribers are forced to pay for and receive rather than as an a la carte channel that can be added to a basic package.

Al Jazeera is owned by the Arab Kingdom of Qatar and has been accused of promoting anti-American and anti-Semitic propaganda.

What troubles many critics of the network is when Al Jazeera held a birthday celebration for terrorist Samir Kuntar, describing him as a “pan-Arab hero.”

Kuntar murdered an Israeli father and his 4-year-old daughter in their home. The Israeli family’s mother accidentally suffocated their toddler son as she tried to muffle his cries while hiding from Kuntar. in addition, Al Jazeera paid for fireworks to celebrate Kuntar’s release from prison.

In the days following the terrorist attacks on Sept.

Click to continue reading “New York lawmaker bashes Al Jazeera as Islamist ‘propaganda”
Go straight to Post

CIA Arming Anti-American Terrorist? So What’s New?

by Humberto Fontova on Tuesday, August 6th, 2013

This is article 1014 of 1260 in the topic International

According to a CNN report by Jake Tapper the CIA and the U.S. State Department may have been trying to supply Syrian jihadists with Libyan arms from Benghazi when the operation blew up in their face last September.

The UK Telegraph summed it up best: “The CIA has been subjecting operatives to monthly polygraph tests in an attempt to suppress details of a US arms smuggling operation in Benghazi that was ongoing when its ambassador was killed by a mob in the city last year, according to reports.”

“Same as it ever was,” say some Cuba-watchers. “Déjà vu all over again say,” say others.

“Me and my staff were all Fidelistas,” boasted Robert Reynolds, the CIA’s “Caribbean Desk’s specialist on the Cuban Revolution” from 1957-1960. Reynolds was visiting Cuba and chumming it up with Fidel himself at the time of his boast, during a conference” in 2001.

“Everyone in the CIA and everyone at State was pro-Castro, except (Republican) ambassador Earl Smith.” (CIA operative in Santiago Cuba 1957’59, Robert Weicha.)

“Don’t worry. We’ve infiltrated Castro’s guerrilla group in the Sierra Mountains. The Castro brothers and Ernesto “Che” Guevara have no affiliations with any Communists whatsoever.” (crackerjack Havana CIA station chief Jim Noel 1958.)

Oh, I know, I know: for over half a century your professors, Hollywood, the media, etc. have all hammered away that Batista was “a U.S. backed dictator!” and that, while fighting Batista, the Castro rebels also fought heroically and David-like against brutal and Goliath-like “Yankee imperialism!” But actually:

“Without U.S. help Fidel Castro would never have gotten into power,” flatly testified former U.S. Ambassador to Cuba, Earl T. Smith during Congressional testimony in 1960.

“I think it is a form of a cover-up, and I think it’s an attempt to push it under the rug, and I think the American people are feeling the same way,” says (Republican) Congressman Frank Wolf who represents the district that contains CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia about the Benghazi attack. “We should have the people who were on the (Benghazi) scene come in, testify under oath, do it publicly, and lay it out. And there really isn’t any national security issue involved with regards to that.”

Indeed. And something very similar happened two years after the State Department and CIA’s darlings took power in Cuba and quickly converted the island into a Soviet satrapy and armory, and playground for Che Guevara’s KGB-mentored firing squads.

Senator DODD. “Well, would you say that these things that occurred also showed that the State Dept. was anxious to replace Batista with Castro?

(Former U.S. Amb. To Cuba) GARDNER. “I think they were.”

Arthur Gardner and Earl Smith were the two U.S. ambassadors to Cuba who warned about Castro and Che Guevara’s covert Communism (and thus lost their jobs.) In 1960 they testified under oath to the Media/State Department collusion and campaign that brought Castro to power:

Senator DODD. You have been quoted, Mr. Gardner, as referring to, “Castro worship” in the State Department in 1957. … you are quoted as saying you fought all the time with the State Department over whether Castro merited the support or friendship of the United States. Would you explain….

Click to continue reading “CIA Arming Anti-American Terrorist? So What’s New?”
Go straight to Post

Obama Removes The Mask

by Thomas E. Brewton on Thursday, July 4th, 2013

This is article 884 of 1015 in the topic Obama

Liberal-progressives are thrilled that the real, social-engineering Obama is re-emerging.

President Obama seems to be motivated in all his actions by a relentless drive to diminish the national security of the United States in world political and military affairs.

Touring Africa, he tells audiences not to trust the United States.  In Berlin recently he spoke of arms reduction in the face of Russia’s moving naval squadrons into the Mediterranean and China’s growing naval provocations of Japan that threaten to fuel a new world military conflict.  Meanwhile he has taken not a single effective action to prevent Iran’s acquisition of nuclear weapons.

At home, he is proposing to reduce energy supplies and to raise their cost to consumers and business in the name of discredited, criminal schemes to promote the social-engineering implicit in so-called global warming.  He continues to champion failing green energy companies, wasting billions of taxpayers’ dollars.

Further evidence that all of this is driven by the Godless religion of socialism, and not by true scientific rationality, is sketched in this Investors’ Business Daily editorial.

Obama vows to destroy the coal mining industry, to hinder drilling for new petroleum deposits, to forestall the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, and to block expansion of fracking for oil and natural gas.  All of these punitive measures he proposes to implement via executive orders and regulatory actions by agencies such as the EPA.

Doing so means neutering the checks and balances structured by our Constitution.  The effect is to bypass Congress and the voters and to consolidate legislative, executive, and judicial powers in one person, His Exalted Excellency Hussein Obama.

As those who wrote the Constitution in 1787 repeatedly noted, while granting sufficient power to the Federal government to protect citizens, avoiding collectivization of power in one individual or one small group of people is essential to preservation of political and economic liberties.  Hence the checks of states’ right under the 10th Amendment, along with the separation of powers among Congress, the presidency, and the judiciary, all of which Obama has publicly lamented and is apparently determined to subvert.

Go straight to Post

Why Can’t the ‘Gang of Eight’ Get It? They and the Demagogue Senators Are “Drunk on Amnesty”.

by Jerry McConnell on Monday, June 24th, 2013

This is article 370 of 468 in the topic Immigration


Many columns and much other discussion about the new AMNESTY plan being cooked up by Harry Reid and his un-American promoters of the socialist-communist liberal Democrat Party and the infamous “Gang of Eight” led by the sleaziest person in our United States Senate, the Senator from New York (naturally) Charles Schumer and his rump-massager, Florida Senator Marco Rubio who almost had Americans convinced that he was a real American instead of the bleeding heart pretender he turned out to be.

But that entire claque of country-killing, communism-practicing, socialist liberal Democrat United States Senators are, as Human Events writer John Hayward says online in his column, “Drunk on Amnesty.”  To me, they’re all drunk out of their minds trying hard to push an amnesty bill that they drunkenly insist is NOT amnesty.  (If it quacks like a duck.)  As Hayward points out, “There’s a storm gathering around one of the provisions in the Gang of Eight amnesty bill, but it needs to gather faster, because the ever consider moving on a bill that would actually help American citizens – say, by reducing the tax and regulatory burden on the private sector to spur job growth.

As all Americans know, the entire gaggle of Democrats in the U. S. Senate is adamantly, yet secretly, opposed to job growth.  In what better way can they keep their prison of voters in poverty, on food stamps, and subservient to them?  Lately, and primarily on this amnesty bill, they have also succeeded in brainwashing four RINO Republicans into believing that they can accomplish amnesty for more votes for Democrats and hoodwink those gullible former patriotic souls into thinking that some of the illegal aliens might actually vote for a Republican.

Hence the need for speed on this bill.  And, of course, they also need to get going before those turncoat RINOs get a small dose of ‘smarts’ and learn that they are not only NOT going to get any illegal alien votes, but this proposed legislation is absolutely NOT NEEDED.  We don’t need Immigration Reform; we need Immigration ENFORCEMENT and RINOs need the deserting conservative voters.  Our immigration policies and laws worked very well before ultra liberal Democrats were born.

Accelerated passage of this legislation, like Reid and Pelosi accomplished with the piece of putrefication now known as ObamaCare, speed is of the essence before both politicians and public actually get around to reading what’s in the proposed legislation.  As John Hayward says, “If we have time to study the bill, we’ll notice things like the provision that waves drunk-driving illegal aliens right to the head of the line for legalization, ahead of all those poor chumps who have been struggling to legally comply with America’s immigration laws.”

Kurt Schlicter,, added a bit of incredible and highly undesirable information in his column, ‘They Will Risk Your Kids’ Lives Before They Risk Immigration Reform’ June 22, 2013, noting that “the immigration bill allows three strikes for drunk-driving illegal aliens before the government will even think about deporting them – and even then, deportation can (and will) be waived at the discretion of the bureaucracy.”

How do you like that sugar-coated pablum for egregious offenders who are close cousins to actual murderers?  You could probably count the number of times on less than five fingers that American justice has liberalized legislation for the benefit of real, natural born Americans just for the sake of easing some deserved punishment?

Click to continue reading “Why Can’t the ‘Gang of Eight’ Get It? They and the Demagogue Senators Are “Drunk on Amnesty”.”
Go straight to Post

Glenn Greenwald Calls “Weakening of America” a “Very Good Thing”

by Cliff Kincaid on Friday, June 14th, 2013

This is article 12 of 12 in the topic Anti-Americanism

In a 2011 article in the socialist publication In These Times, anti-NSA journalist Glenn Greenwald said “the only thing that can truly strengthen America’s national security is a weakening of America.” He also declared that al-Qaeda’s 9/11 terrorist attacks on America were “very minimal in scope compared to the level of deaths that the United States has been bringing to the world for decades—from Vietnam to illegal wars in Central America…”

Blogger Trevor Loudon, who first reported the controversial comments, notes that, in the speech that is the basis for the article, Greenwald  described senior al-Qaeda leader Anwar al-Awlaki, who planned terrorist operations, as “someone who the U.S. government hates because he speaks effectively to the Muslim world about the violence that the United States commits regionally, and the responsibility of Muslims to stand up to that violence.”

Greenwald’s history of anti-American bias and rhetoric has been ignored by most media outlets, even by commentators on the right. But they are highly relevant to the fact that he has emerged as the mouthpiece for former NSA contract employee Edward Snowden, who released classified information about the activities of the spy agency, and is now hiding out in Chinese Hong Kong.

In his first public comments on Snowden, FBI director Robert Mueller said at a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday that the disclosures about the terrorist surveillance programs have caused “significant harm to the nation” and that Snowden “is the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation.”

The “In These Times” article was adapted, with Greenwald’s permission, from a speech he gave to the “Socialism 2011” conference, co-sponsored by a Marxist-Leninist group, the International Socialist Organization. AIM has reported that Greenwald has been attending these conferences on an annual basis.

In his speech, Greenwald declared the U.S. to be a “declining empire,” and announced that its “leaders” seek to remain in power through “militarism and civil liberties assaults.” He added, “If they can continue to scare the population enough with threats of foreign evil and foreign villains, they will overlook the raping and pillaging taking place domestically that these leaders are engaged in and get behind these leaders.”

Getting into his discussion of 9/11, which killed nearly 3,000 Americans, Greenwald said, “They [al Qaeda] knew that a single attack on US soil, very minimal in scope compared to the level of violence that we bring to the world and have been bringing to the world for decades, would trigger these bankruptcy-inducing policies. And that is what we’re seeing. Ironically, the only thing that could stop this kind of growing assault on civil liberties, the militarism that accompanies it, is a weakening of the U.S. to the point where they’re no longer sustainable and the weakening is happening precisely because of these very policies. And oftentimes if you’re in the United States and you talk about a weakening of the United States, it’s considered to be a thing that we want to avoid like it’s a very bad thing. But, I think it’s a very good thing.”

The communists greeted his remarks with applause.

Greenwald, a slavish disciple of Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, defended Assange going to work for Moscow-funded Russia Today (RT) television.

Click to continue reading “Glenn Greenwald Calls “Weakening of America” a “Very Good Thing””
Go straight to Post

President Obama is not like any American, or even politician, I have ever know or have seen …

by Stephen Levine on Tuesday, May 28th, 2013

This is article 868 of 1015 in the topic Obama

Every once in a while, someone sends me an e-mail containing an article that resonates as a truthful exposition of what I also believe to be true. In many cases, stated far more eloquently and succinctly than similar expositions. Therefore, it is with the written permission of the author, Maureen Scott, and the website, that I offer the following re-print article to my readers.

The Architect of Destruction

By Maureen Scott

“Obama comes from a community organizer background where it’s us against them. But that’s not who we are. And that’s not the position the leader of our Nation should take.”
– Dr. Benjamin Carson
Obama appears to be a tormented man who is filled with resentment, anger, and disdain for anyone of an opinion or view other than his. He acts in the most hateful, spiteful, malevolent, vindictive ways in order to manipulate and maintain power and control over others. Perhaps because, as a child, he grew up around family members and mentors who instilled him with an abiding bitterness toward the U.S. That bitterness seems not to have left him.

It is not the color of his skin that is a problem – for anyone in America. Rather it is the blackness that fills his soul and the hollowness in his heart where there should be abiding pride and love for this country.

Think: Have we ever heard Obama speak lovingly of the U.S. or its people, with deep appreciation and genuine respect for our history, our customs, our sufferings and our blessings? Has he ever revealed that, like most patriotic Americans, he gets “goose bumps” when a band plays “The Star Spangled Banner,” or sheds a tear when he hears a beautiful rendition of “America the Beautiful?” Does his heart burst with pride when millions of American flags wave on a National holiday – or is he moved to sadness and reflection when someone plays “taps” on a trumpet? Has he ever felt the depth of our admiration of the military, as lovers of those who keep America free feel when soldiers march by? It is doubtful – because Obama did not grow up sharing our experiences or our values. He did not sit at the knee of a grandfather or uncle who showed his medals and told of the bravery of his fellow troops as they fought and tramped through foreign lands sacrificing for a cause greater than their own lives. He didn’t have grandparents who told stories of suffering and then coming to America, penniless, and the opportunities they had for building a business and life for their children.

Away from this country as a young child, Obama didn’t delight in being part of America and its greatness. He wasn’t singing our patriotic songs in kindergarten, or standing on the roadside for a holiday parade and eating a hot dog, or lighting sparklers around a campfire on July 4th as fireworks exploded over head, or placing flags on the gravesites of fallen and beloved American heroes.

Rather Obama was separated from all of these experiences. He doesn’t really understand us and what it means to be an American. He is void of the basic emotions that most feel regarding this country and is insensitive to the instinctive pride we have in our national heritage.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

Featuring YD Feedwordpress Content Filter Plugin