Author Archive

America on the Brink of Anarchy

by JB Williams on Saturday, December 24th, 2011

When government leaders demonstrate a blatant disregard for the rule of law, the citizens soon follow that example. When justice becomes nothing more than a tool for socialist experiments known as social justice, no longer a system of equal protections guided by existing laws, the people will seek their own form of justice and anarchy will reign, until justice is restored.

Our federal government has refused to keep its Constitutional promise to the states and the people, to among other things, control and enforce our immigration laws, demonstrating a blatant disregard for the rule of law, the state and legal American citizens, not to mention their constitutional obligation.

Border States were left to enforce the law within their own states. But federal courts, which have no jurisdiction over the states, stepped in and blocked the states from enforcing the law and today, dozens of Sheriff Deputies turn in their federal credentials, refusing to abide by federal mandates to break existing immigration laws.

Meanwhile, the Democrat Mayor of D.C. announces his executive order to stand down on federal immigration laws in his city, and Democrat Connecticut Mayor of New Haven, already known as a sanctuary city for illegal activity, announces his intentions to allow illegal aliens to vote in the upcoming 2012 election cycle. The Obama Administration supports both illegal acts.

Democrat Mayors, Governors, law-makers, judges and the White House are living in blatant violation of the law, their oaths of office, the will of legal American citizens and their constitutional authority.

How much longer will the people sit quietly, before taking justice into their own hands, in what has clearly become a lawless society?

Clearly, government officials from the White House all the way down to your local town and all points in-between, have a total disregard for the rule of law and the Constitution of these once United States. Every day, we see government officials act beyond their authority, in direct violation of the law and their oaths of office – still, the American people sit silent, waiting… but for what?

The people allowed their Constitutional Representative Republic to be quietly replaced with a Marxist form of democracy (aka Democratic Socialism) and we are now witnessing simple democracy at its worst. Washington D.C. is the belly of the beast, in terms of political and judicial corruption and lawlessness. But that corruption and lawlessness has been systematically spread across the country, throughout the federal courts, all the way down to your local traffic court.

Judges are no longer restrained by the law. They operate as political tools for change – henchmen for a corrupt administration, federal, state and local. Our nation has been systematically pushed to the brink of anarchy, a lawless society wherein the people will have to exact justice themselves, or live under the boot of government tyranny.

The people have already been silent too long. What are they waiting for?

Fifty years ago, the people could have resolved this matter peacefully, via constitutional processes put in place to protect the people and the states from government corruption and tyranny. But today, the mechanisms of justice have been stolen from the people, just like the rest of their government.

The people have no place to turn, to restore the rule of law and constitutional government.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by myBB free talk radio
  • powered by SMF back packing in michigan
  • ap by elections
  • Burr Ridge Ill indictment carl strumillo
  • powered by phpBB cornell legal information institute

AMERICA’S GOT TALENT and RACIAL EQUALITY

by JB Williams on Saturday, September 24th, 2011

A young black man by the name of Landau Eugene Murphy Jr. was just voted the 2011 winner of NBC’s national talent competition, America’s Got Talent. Landau was from across the tracks, a car washer by trade. But he was a car washer who took pride in an honest living and had always dreamt of becoming a famous singer and now, he is one.

Landau is a great example of a good and decent young American man, husband and father who kept his family going by washing cars as he dreamt of a better future.

Landau was elected the 2011 winner of America’s Got Talent (AGT) by the American people. Not because he is black, but because he is the classic personal achievement rags to rich’s story that Americans deeply relate to and love, as an example of what possibilities make America the greatest nation on earth.

Without any affirmative action favors at all, Landau ascended from career car washer to millionaire singer and Las Vegas headline act, all on his own steam, driven by his own dream. That’s as American as it gets and race played no factor in it whatsoever.

Landau didn’t ask people to make him the first black male winner of America’s Got Talent. He just asked for the chance to prove to America what he was capable of and man was he capable.

Landau is an untrained singer who had never performed before an audience before auditioning for AGT. America immediately embraced him, not because he was black, but because he was born with golden pipes and all he needed was a chance to shine. That’s the classic American story…

Landau’s natural talent and his personal likeability factor (X Factor) were undeniable from the start. My wife and kids became Landau fans at his first audition, as did I. Like the rest of America that supported Landau all the way to victory, my family could not have cared less what color Landau was or what job he held to keep his family going while pursuing his personal version of happiness.

Landau represents all good and decent American citizens of all shapes, sizes, colors and creeds. Landau is living the American dream and he has proven that the dream is still alive and well for all Americans, no matter race.

Now, compare Landau to Barack Hussein Obama II.

Barack Obama was not elected president of the United States because he was extraordinarily talented. He was not elected president due to his life-long history of personal achievements. In fact, Obama had never even held a job washing cars or flipping burgers before being elected president of the United States. Obama’s résumé was completely blank before entering politics and remains largely blank even after.

Barack Obama’s campaign was based entirely upon “making history” by electing the first “black” president. His campaign for the highest office in our land was not based upon his résumé, which is completely void of any personal accomplishments. It was based upon his alleged race, and I say alleged race because Barack Hussein Obama is not actually a “black” American, although that’s the way his story was fashioned to create a race challenge in the 2008 election. No man with a Caucasian parent is a “black” man.

Click to continue reading “AMERICA’S GOT TALENT and RACIAL EQUALITY”
Go straight to Post

‘Is Obama Ineligibility a Side Show or the Main Event?’

by JB Williams on Wednesday, April 13th, 2011

This is article 128 of 609 in the topic Obama

Despite monumental efforts to keep Obama’s entire past completely under wraps, questions persist over who and what Barack Hussein Obama really is and how a half-term senate political neophyte with a totally blank resume managed to defeat the Clinton machine to become the most secretive president in U.S. history. Is it a side show, or the main event?

Because Obama has refused to release his official vault birth certificate, college, passport records or family history including all medical records, and because he and those covering for him insist that there is ‘nothing to see here’ – many Americans are increasingly interested in how Obama was able to happen to America.

His many overt anti-American and anti-constitution policies have driven speculation that not only is he not a natural born citizen eligible for the office he holds, he may not even be American at all.

Business mogul Donald Trump appears ready to run for office on the search for a real Obama birther certificate. Not a COLB, but a real authentic birth certificate that looks just like every other American birth certificate.

The press is largely responsible for the ongoing circus, as they have been completely uninterested in the matter for almost three years now. Never before in history has the press taken so little sincere journalistic interest in what could be the greatest scam ever perpetrated on American voters.

They still claim that Obama’s COLB (Certification of Live Birth) is an actual birth certificate, even though we all know that it isn’t. We have seen real Hawaii birth certificates from people born in Hawaii on the same day Obama claims to have been born, even from the same hospital.

But is the missing birth certificate the real issue?

We all agree that the constitution requires one to be a natural born citizen of the United States to be president – “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;” – But there is more than one definition of natural born citizen being proposed.

· The Obot definition is simply citizen – native, natural, naturalized, hatchet, all being one in the same, using 14th Amendment naturalization arguments which are actually unrelated to the subject.

· The birther definition is one line borrowed from Vattel’s book on the Law of Nations – “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” – But this definition ignores everything else Vattel said on the matter.

· The historians definition also comes from Vattel’s Law of Nations, but relies on the entire body of work; 1) As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights; 2) The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; 3) in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

The Fed – Shut it Down

by JB Williams on Thursday, April 7th, 2011

This is article 8 of 14 in the topic Government Shutdown

There should be no debate over spending in DC at this point. Over the last seventy years, our federal government, behaving as an unconstitutional supreme central power, has spent the most productive and prosperous nation on earth into third world status. Bickering over a few billion in planned deficit spending above $1.65 trillion in just the next year, when the nation is already more than $14 trillion in unsustainable debt threatening the very existence of our dollar – is the definition of insanity.

Democrats are forcing a so-called shutdown in their effort to keep spending money we don’t have. Republicans are only calling for a symbolic level of spending cuts. Nobody in Washington DC seems serious about ending the fiscal insanity. Even the president’s bi-partisan debt panel is recommending deficit spending for at least another twenty-five years.

I say, shut it down! The federal government has done more to harm the union of states than they have ever done to improve freedom and liberty in America. We will be better off without a federal government, each state able to fund and govern itself better than the Fed ever will.

Extreme threats demand extreme measures, and nothing threatens the future freedom and prosperity of the United States more than our own federal government. Enemies beyond, we can deal with. It’s the enemy within which threatens us most today. It’s time to shut it down and reset.

As we have proven in election after election, changing the players on the field from time to time does not change the game. We need a game changer here, beginning with forcing our elected servants to live within the confines of the Constitution, existing laws and the budget that we allow them.

Everything in this country is backwards, up-side-down and inside-out. The people can never win a game in which they are not even a player. DC players make up the rules as they go and those rules never benefit the people.

When Obama and the Democratic Socialists of America passed unconstitutional acts like ObamaCare, Obama Czars, deep intrusions into private sector banking, manufacturing and education, Republicans should have shut it all down then.

They simply didn’t have the backbone to do what they should have done on behalf of every American citizen, including the ones not smart enough to know that they can’t survive a bankrupt nation either.

As British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher said so well – “The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.” – We ran out of other people’s money more than $14 trillion ago.

Republicans should up the ante here… Instead of allowing Democrats to accuse them of shutting down the government over a measly $30 billion, they should force Democrats to blame them for eliminating the entire $1.65 trillion deficit proposed in Obama’s budget.

Are Republicans scared of being accused of balancing the budget? Most Americans want somebody to balance the budget and stop the insane march into the financial abyss, under the unbridled command of the international socialist left now known as the Democrat Party.

Our federal budget has only been balanced once since Andrew Jackson was president. Republicans balanced one annual budget during Bill Clinton’s second term.

Click to continue reading “The Fed — Shut it Down”
Go straight to Post

Obama A Traitor and War Criminal – Where is Congress?

by JB Williams on Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011

This is article 75 of 163 in the topic US Military

On the eighth anniversary of the day President George W. Bush ordered US troops into Iraq in 2003, with the full support of the US Congress and majority support from the UN Security Council, Barack Obama launched a Tomahawk missile assault on the sovereign nation of Libya with no majority support in the UN and without even consulting congress.

Acting alone while congress was away on recess, solely at the command of the United Nations and without constitutional authority, Barack Obama dropped over $70 million worth of Tomahawk missiles on the sovereign nation of Libya in a dictatorial maneuver to force regime change of a foreign land.

He launched a military assault on Libya under what authority? To be certain, Gadhafi is no prize, but what Obama just did is far worse. Acting all alone in a truly imperialistic fashion, Obama violated his Oath of Office, Article I and II of the US Constitution and The War Powers Act all in one mindless kneejerk decision.

Article II – Section II of the US Constitution identifies the US President as the civilian oversight of the US Military and Commander-in-Chief. But it gives the US President no authority to use military might to enforce its political will upon foreign nations.

Article I – Section VIII of the US Constitution rests the power to declare war solely with the US Congress. It requires both the Commander-in-Chief and Congress to commit US troops to combat, without which the act is wholly unconstitutional.

Even the Washington Times managed to get this one right in its editorial – Obama’s Illegal War.

The 1973 War Powers Act was put in place to prevent a US President from doing exactly what Barack Obama just did.

SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

A US Commander-in-Chief can order use of military force in only three specific conditions…

1. a declaration of war,
2. specific statutory authorization, or
3. a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

The US Congress has not declared war against a foreign nation since WWII. But when George W. Bush sent troops into Afghanistan and Iraq following the September 11, 2001 attacks on US soil, he not only consulted congress in advance, he sought and received specific statutory authorization from congress before ordering troops into combat. Bush complied with the constitution and War Powers Act under conditions (2) and (3). He also had a broad coalition of UN partners backed by years of Iraqi broken UN resolutions.

In the case of Obama and Libya, none of these conditions exist.

1. Congress did not declare war.
2.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

Democrats Scramble to Save Their #1 Donor – The Teachers

by JB Williams on Tuesday, March 15th, 2011

This is article 45 of 85 in the topic Democratic Party

America’s BIGGEST political donor is not corporate America, bankers, Insurers or Wall Street. It is the National Education Association, which gave over $56 million in campaign donations in the 2008 election cycle alone, and American Federation of Teachers, which gave over $12 million in 2008. Combined, these two teachers unions gave over $68 million in 2008, ALL of it to Democrats. Still trying to figure out why Democrats are desperate to save the public sector unions?

Democrats scramble to prop up public sector unions not on behalf of teachers or students, but rather on their own behalf, as the NEA is the single largest political donor in America today and they give almost 100% to DEMOCRATS! In short, without millions in campaign funding from the national teachers union, teachers would be better off, but Democrats would be in DEEP trouble!

Lately, there has been a lot of leftist press drivel about Republican supporters, the Koch brothers and Koch Industries, which has given some $11 million in campaign donations over the last ten years or so, 89% of it to Republicans. They aren’t even an ant in the sandbox of politics, compared to the NEA, which is more like the sand in the sandbox.

Koch Industries ranks #83 on the TOP 100 list of political donors. They are nothing compared to the NEA who gave more than $56 million in 2008 alone, essentially ALL of it to Democrats, and ranks #8 on the TOP 100 donor list.

Teachers working in the National Public Indoctrination System need a labor union for one reason only, to raise money from teachers to support the Democrat Party. Teachers, half of whom are fed up with federal indoctrination mandates, are NOT the winners in the current system. Leftist Democrats are, and their union thug buddies who advance their international socialist agenda via the Democrat Party, paid for largely by public school teachers.

I get why Democrats are scrambling to save the public sector unions, and even why other public sector employees need a union so that they can’t be fired for not doing their jobs.

But why are teachers supporting all of this anti-American indoctrination with their union dues and protest signs?

In the good old days, we were told to look for the union label and buy products made in America. After labor unions ran private sector manufacturing out of America, government jobs is pretty much the only place you can find the union label.

Beyond George Soros’ ActBlue Democrat juggernaut, it’s the teachers union, the American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees of public sector employees, the mass media union and scumbag lawyer union American Assn for Justice, that make today’s Democratic Socialist movement possible.

Without teachers, government employees and lawyers, there would be NO Democrat Party or democratic socialism in America today!

How dare those evil Republicans try to liberate American taxpayers from these cut throat leftist thugs. No wonder Democrats ran away to Chicago as Gov. Walker moved to liberate Wisconsin taxpayers.

$68 million in campaign money buys a lot of loyalty from leftist Democrats, huh? The teachers should be ashamed to protest. Shut up and return to the classroom before we hire your replacements. Fire your unions and keep the $68 million to feed your families next time!

Go straight to Post

Life, Liberty and Collective Thuggery

by JB Williams on Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

This is article 74 of 131 in the topic Unions

Once again, since Obama’s secular socialist community organizing press won’t tell the American people the truth, someone has to! Over the years, I have written more about our Founding Fathers and documents than most Americans have ever read in a lifetime. But just in case I missed something, I went back and read the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights one more time and nowhere did I find a “right to collective bargaining” – aka criminal socialist union thuggery, intimidation and extortion.

Public Opinion

Did anyone really have to poll to come up with this answer? Most taxpayers are sick of being bankrupted or held hostage by union thuggery and oppose labor unions, especially for public servant jobs paid for by taxpayers. Ironically, most union thugs like unions… This, they call “breaking news!”

It depends on who you ask… but as a general rule, you can anticipate that socialists see nothing wrong with socialism (collectivism) and everything wrong with freedom, individual rights and capitalism. People willing to trade their individual rights for collective bargaining rights love unions, while people still stuck on individual rights tend to hate them.

Public vs. Private

The discussion also changes based on public sector jobs paid for by taxpayers, vs. private sector jobs, paid for by private employers and ultimately the consumers of goods and services. Private sector jobs feed the public trough and public sector jobs drain the public trough. Hence, there is a significant difference between the two – one being on the asset side of the ledger, the other being a liability for every American taxpayer.

Most Americans believe in and support the concept of individual rights, not the collective rights of one special group over all others. Still, most support the right to private sector unions, so long as the people have a right to reject unions, under right to work laws.

They also accept the right of union shops to bid on government contracts, but not exclusively via union bid only laws, which keep 88% of the workforce from even bidding on government contracts, though they still have to pay for them.

But in the public sector, labor unions amount to nothing more than the collective extortion of taxpayers. The right for a few to hold an entire state or nation hostage until they can milk taxpayers for ever increasing wages and benefits, in what is supposed to be public servant jobs.

The insane practice should have never been allowed to begin with, and should have ended long ago. Whether it’s Iceland, Greece, the Middle East, Wisconsin or the United States, public sector union extortion has bankrupted government after government leaving union pension funds unfunded to the tune of a trillion dollars in the U.S. alone. Once the public feeding trough has run dry, there is nothing left to negotiate, which is exactly what Wisconsin Governor Walker told state union workers. Indiana Republicans should have had as much backbone and sooner or later, they will have no choice.

The Union Revolt

Union community thug-in-chief Barack Obama is working with his civilian army, made up of well-indoctrinated college students, union members, Black Panthers, Muslims and illegal aliens still praying for amnesty, to create a national disaster out of the battle between taxpayers and the international labor movement.

Click to continue reading “Life, Liberty and Collective Thuggery”
Go straight to Post

‘Montana: When did the Bill of Rights become Unconstitutional?’

by JB Williams on Friday, February 25th, 2011

This is article 18 of 94 in the topic US Constitution

Democrat Montana Governor Schweitzer made an unannounced visit to the Democrat Caucus Monday to voice his concern over what he calls these un-American and unconstitutional bills. – “When we say, that we will nullify a portion of federal law that is simply saying that we don’t consider ourselves bound by the constitution of the United States of America, that’s very dangerous territory,” says Governor Schweitzer.

Republican House Rep. Derek Skees, sponsor of the Montana Nullification Reaffirmation Act, replied with – “the Governor isn’t qualified to deem bills unconstitutional. He isn’t any more of a scholar in constitutionality of law then any of us.”

Rep. Skees bill reaffirms the state of Montana’s 10th Amendment right to hold the federal government in check and within the limited powers delegated to the FED in the US Constitution. Governor Schweitzer has publicly deemed that right “unconstitutional” and even “un-American.”

In order for the Governor to be right, the Bill of Rights would have to be “unconstitutional” and even “un-American,” as Rep. Skees bill is based upon Amendments Nine and Ten of the US Constitution.

Amendment Nine – The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment Ten – The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Apparently, the Governor is unfamiliar with the Bill of Rights, as well as the concepts of federalism and state sovereignty. Maybe the Governor is unfamiliar with the fact that his state also has a Constitution and states’ rights as a result.

The Montana Nullification Reaffirmation Act does not grant Montana the power to nullify “constitutional” acts of the federal government, under powers delegated to the federal government within the US Constitution.

The ACT reaffirms an existing right of all states, to overrule “unconstitutional” acts of the federal government whenever the federal government acts beyond the scope and authority granted it by the states, and when such an abuse of power is deemed by the state to be at odds with the best interest of the state and/or its citizens.

Rep. Skees bill is based entirely upon the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. When did the US Constitution and Bill of Rights become “unconstitutional” and “un-American” in the minds of Democrat politicians like Governor Schweitzer? – Or maybe the governor did not bother to read the ACT before commenting?

Governor Schweitzer is a farmer and rancher with no prior political, legal or legislative experience. He is not a lawyer or a constitutional scholar. Maybe he truly does not know or understand the Constitution, states’ rights or the Bill of Rights—and is simply ill-equipped to act as Governor of a state that he has sworn an oath to protect and defend, even from federal tyranny. How does a governor protect the rights of his state and his citizens when he doesn’t even know what those rights are?

Click to continue reading “‘Montana: When did the Bill of Rights become Unconstitutional?’”
Go straight to Post

It’s All About The Socialist Unions, Not Jobs

by JB Williams on Tuesday, February 22nd, 2011

This is article 64 of 131 in the topic Unions

As usual, the American press is totally misrepresenting events in Wisconsin, Ohio and beyond, where state Governors are finally taking appropriate action to address their state budget disasters before state bankruptcy is their only option.

To set the record straight, Wisconsin and Ohio labor protests are NOT for the purpose of protecting jobs or even reasonable pay and benefits for public sector employees. The protests are focused solely on saving public sector unions, without which, there is no Democrat Party.

That explains why state and federal Democrats worked to rally and bus union thugs to Wisconsin as Democrat legislators fled from the state and their duties as legislators in an effort to shut down public schools and state business. Wisconsin business and education is being held hostage by 14 Democrats on the run in Illinois. – And that’s why collective bargaining and union thuggery must end for government jobs.

It’s NOT about “fair employment”

According to 2009 reports from the I.R.S. and Department of Labor, our national median household income rests at $49,777 – which of course takes into consideration both single and two income households. Two income households have a median income of $61,265 while single income households have a median income of only $30,444.

In contrast, teachers have a much better deal with a national average teacher salary of over $85,000 per year, plus golden benefits that most Americans can’t buy for any amount of money.

“There is a persistent misconception that teachers are not well paid. But a recent survey by the BLS shows that you can earn a very respectable teacher salary. Below is a list of the average annual salaries for teachers in some of the top-paying states.” – (From All Education Report)

* California – 128,930
* Texas – 102,630
* New York – 74,070
* Ohio – 52,060
* Pennsylvania – 46,770
* Illinois – $67,960
* Alaska – $67,640
* Connecticut – $65,790
* New Jersey – $65,420
* Rhode Island – $65, 050
* Massachusetts – $61,470

Basically, teachers are the highest paid people in pretty much any community. People can debate whether or not teachers should be the highest paid people in their community, but there can be no debate over the disastrous results of union tenure, collective thuggery and broken budgets that can no longer afford to be held hostage by labor unions.

Let’s be clear, teachers and other union members are fighting to keep households making $30k to $49k per year, paying union members 150-250% in higher wages and salaries, not counting their golden benefits that no other American has. They are desperate to keep their unions because without collective extortion rights, the 7% of American workers who belong to unions will be just like the other 93% of American workers, individuals with individual rights.

More than 60% of union workers

Private sector unions are almost gone in America, as union thugs forced U.S. manufacturing to move abroad in order to remain competitive in the retail market. As a result, over 60% of American union workers now hold government jobs or government contracts, ALL of them at direct expense to American taxpayers.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

Without Labor Unions, There is NO Democrat Party!

by JB Williams on Sunday, February 20th, 2011

Democrats and their labor unions have painted themselves into a corner that they will not be able to escape. Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio and other states are about to eliminate public sector unions and collective bargaining rights for state employees and not a moment too soon.

The assembly votes are coming down party lines and the reason is glaringly obvious. Without labor unions and the billions they pour into the Democrat Party, there will be NO Democrat Party.

Iceland, Greece, the EU nations and even the Middle East are in some stage of economic meltdown, all of it due to public sector over-spending mostly caused by the collective thuggery of international socialist labor unions. America is no exception, with most states considering the bankruptcy option to get out from under unsustainable public sector union contracts and unfunded pensions.

Face it—this is a war between international socialist labor unions and the taxpayers of the world stuck with a tab they can no longer afford to pay.

After bankrupting the manufacturing industry in nation after nation, labor unions have been in a steady decline for decades. Lost private sector union jobs have been replaced with public sector union jobs, all in an effort to keep the international socialist agenda alive and well in the Democrat Party by keeping those dollars rolling in via union dues.

The 3rd largest political juggernaut in America, The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees has been bankrupting governments across the country for years now, using their collective bargaining rights to destroy state, county and municipal budgets by holding taxpayers hostage at contract time.

Democrats are for it because this public sector union has invested over $43 million in Democrat power between 1990 and 2010. This union gives 99% of its political donations to Democrats, essentially nothing to Republicans over the last twenty years. That’s why Democrats vote for unions and against taxpayers at every opportunity.

The 6th largest political juggernaut in America is the American Association for Justice. This is the trial lawyer and judge association that has destroyed the American justice system from top to bottom and they have given over $33 million since 1990, almost all of it to Democrats.

In 2010 alone, this organization gave more than $2.8 million to Democrats, compared to only $73 thousand to Republicans. Ask again why your courts are aligned with international socialists, labor unions and anti-constitution Democrats.

The 8th largest political juggernaut in the U.S. is the National Education Association. This teachers union had the resources to invest over $32 million on politics since 1990, 93% of it to Democrats. In 2010, they gave over $2.2 million to Democrats compared to $131 thousand to Republicans.

Of course Democrats vote with international socialist unions and against taxpayers. The taxpayers hate greedy Democrats and without the unions, trial lawyers and judges, there would be NO Democrat Party today!

But the end is near and none too soon!

While everyone was focused on how many House seats Republicans picked up in 2010, few notice that Republicans took governorships and state legislatures away from Democrats all across the country.

Click to continue reading “Without Labor Unions, There is NO Democrat Party!”
Go straight to Post