Author Archive

Genius on Parade: Protesters March to Rush Limbaugh ‘Office’ That is in Fact 1,000 Miles From His Office

by Doug Powers on Saturday, May 19th, 2012

This is article 152 of 152 in the topic Marches/Protests/Riots

There was another collective power outage in the heads of Occupiers this week.

From The Blaze:

A crowd of Occupy protesters in Chicago descended on Rush Limbaugh’s “office” Thursday to air their grievances about the conservative radio host.

The problem? Despite their references to”Rush’s office building“ and ”Rush Limbaugh’s studio,” they weren’t in the right place — not by more than 1,000 miles.

It seems the protesters — banded together by this weekend’s NATO summit — confused Limbaugh’s real “office building” with one of the hundreds of stations that merely air his show. Limbaugh lives in Palm Beach, Fla.

#OccupyWrongCity

Fail of the day:

nullHere’s another epic flush-Rush fail courtesy of a handful of NOW harpies.

Go straight to Post

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by SMF ohio snowmobile trails

Biden: Hey, I don’t blame people for voting for a convicted felon instead of my boss

by Doug Powers on Saturday, May 19th, 2012

This is article 685 of 687 in the topic 2012 Elections

I’m not sure how thrilled Obama will be when he finds out his Veep is going around saying he doesn’t blame so many people for voting for a convicted felon over the President, but Plugs is at least toeing the company line by blaming Bush for it:

Here’s a clip from Vice President Joe Biden’s interview with WTOV-TV in West Virginia yesterday, the latest stop he’s made this week, where he was asked about what he made of out-of-state incarcerated felon Keith Judd getting roughly 40 percent of the vote against President Obama in the recent Democratic primary:

“Look, I come from a household where whenever there’s a recession, somebody around my grand-pop or my dad’s table lost a job.

“A brother, a sister a friend, a neighbor. When you’re out of work, man, it’s a depression. And a lot of people are still hurting because of this god-awful recession we inherited that cost 8.4 million jobs before we could really get going. And so I don’t blame people, they’re frustrated, they’re angry.”

I hear ya, Joe. If I had a dime for every time I was experiencing a financial hardship and said to myself “If only there was an incarcerated felon I could vote for to fix all this,” I’d be… still in financial hardship.

Maybe so many people in the West Virginia primary voted for someone in jail because they figured he’d be able to find a running-mate in the yard who is more hinged than this guy:

Did you detect a hint of Fredo in that Biden rant?

Compare/contrast:

Go straight to Post

White House Denial: No Biographies Have Been Altered

by Doug Powers on Friday, May 18th, 2012

This is article 605 of 609 in the topic Obama

nullOn Tuesday we (and the rest of the free world) mocked the Obama administration for including pitiful addendums at the bottom the biographies of almost every president from the last century.

The Obama administration, true to narcissistic form, don’t really understand why people are making a big deal out of it. Besides, technically, they didn’t change any of the bios:

The Obama White House is drawing ridicule for appending the official online biographies of nearly every president over the last century, in order to link President Barack Obama’s accomplishments to the former commanders-in-chief.

The Obama team went into the pages of US presidents dating back to Calvin Coolidge to add “Did you know?” fact boxes to the end of their bios. Those additions were used to plug a host of Obama administration initiatives.

For instance, the following line was added to the official bio of Ronald Reagan, “In a June 28, 1985, speech, Reagan called for a fairer tax code, one where a multimillionaire did not have a lower tax rate than his secretary. Today, President Obama is calling for the same with the Buffett Rule.”

The White House defended itself, saying, “No biographies have been altered. We simply added links at the bottom of each page to related whitehouse.gov content, which is a commonly used best practice to encourage people to browse more pages on a site.”

The additions do include links, but each one touts an Obama administration policy or practice in the process.

So it’s kind of like Obama building a monument of himself next to the Lincoln Memorial with the inscription “Yeah, what he said,” and then saying, “What’s the big deal? We didn’t make any changes to the Lincoln thing.” But I’ll stop talking about that because I don’t want to give them any ideas.

(h/t JWF)

Go straight to Post

Obama’s Former Literary Agents Were Birthers!; Updated

by Doug Powers on Friday, May 18th, 2012

This is article 604 of 609 in the topic Obama

nullHere’s a bio of Barack Obama put out by his former literary agents, Acton & Dystel, in 1991. Anything seem out of sorts?

Whew! For a minute there I thought Obama’s bio was going to claim he was part Cherokee. But still, The One must be furious that the people at his agency were birthers before the world even knew what birthers were. And to think he paid them a healthy commission for circulating this tripe!

Maybe as a joke some former presidents went back in time and messed with Obama’s bio just to see how he likes it.

All the background on that bio is here. Speculate away!

Update: A person who was an assistant at the agency at the time has said it was a “fact checking error.” (Job offer from the Associated Press incoming!) It would be interesting to find out if this same “fact checking error” was made on, say, Obama’s admissions application to Harvard. We’ll probably never know.

Go straight to Post

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by SMF motorcycle accident lawyers north georgia
  • powered by SMF corporate practice of medicine
  • powered by vBulletin personal injury lawyer in

President Obama Makes History

by Doug Powers on Wednesday, May 16th, 2012

This is article 602 of 609 in the topic Obama

nullWhen I write that President Obama has “made history,” I’m not referring to this obvious historic first or even the that that Obama is the first president to ever to run up the debt over $5 trillion on his watch. Those things are indeed historic, but the history that’s being made here is in the very literal sense:

The Heritage Foundation’s Rory Cooper tweeted that Obama had casually dropped his own name into Ronald Reagan’s official biography on www.whitehouse.gov, claiming credit for taking up the mantle of Reagan’s tax reform advocacy with his “Buffett Rule” gimmick. My first thought was, he must be joking. But he wasn’t — it turns out Obama has added bullet points bragging about his own accomplishments to the biographical sketches of every single U.S. president since Calvin Coolidge (except, for some reason, Gerald Ford).

Check it out for yourself on the “learn more about each president” page at WhiteHouse.gov. Here’s one example from the Calvin Coolidge page:

On Feb. 22, 1924 Calvin Coolidge became the first president to make a public radio address to the American people. President Coolidge later helped create the Federal Radio Commission, which has now evolved to become the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). President Obama became the first president to hold virtual gatherings and town halls using Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn, etc.

The Twitterverse finds this extremely mock-worthy, and rightly so.

In the Truman bio, the administration’s historians forgot to mention Obama’s role in the liberation of the Philippines during World War II, but I’m sure they’ll get around to it:

null

Go straight to Post

Incoming search terms:

  • Powered by Article Dashboard west indies

Tax in the City: Sarah Jessica Parker Next Celebrity Stooge in Line to Host Obama Fundraiser

by Doug Powers on Friday, May 18th, 2012

This is article 684 of 687 in the topic 2012 Elections

nullObama milked L.A. and George Clooney for all it was worth, so it’s on to New York… again. But this time with a different celebrity idiot.

This just landed in my email box:

It’s my honor to invite you to take part in an event I’m hosting at my home with the President and First Lady on June 14th.

If you can make a donation of any amount today, you’ll be automatically entered to win two tickets to New York to join us.

Just before Election Day in 2008, I went to an Obama campaign office in New York and called some undecided voters.

I believed then, as I do now, that if we all chipped in and did our part, we would not only make history, but create meaningful change that so many Americans needed.

For me, this election is even more important than 2008.

As a woman, a mother, and an entrepreneur, I need to believe our country can be a place where everyone has a fair shot at success.

This November’s election will determine whether we get to keep moving forward, or if we’re forced to go back to policies that ask people like my middle-class family in Ohio to carry the burden — while people like me, who don’t need tax breaks, get extra help.

I’m hosting this event on June 14th because there is so much at stake this year, and I want to keep doing what I can.

I hope you’ll help me welcome President Obama and the First Lady to New York.

It should be fabulous.

Donate $3 or whatever you can to be automatically entered to win:

https://donate.barackobama.com/Night-in-New-York

Hope to see you there,

Sarah Jessica

“Forced to go back to policies that ask people like my middle-class family in Ohio to carry the burden”? Heaven forbid their super-rich glitterati relative feel compelled to send them a few dollars. It’s so much easier just to force strangers to pay up.

Ever notice that these vacuous celebs who think everybody deserves a fair shot at success always say they have more than enough money but never retire to make room for other aspiring actors? If it is in fact a “zero sum game” as they usually indicate, the best thing they could do to help others would be to go away!

Somewhat related: Here’s Sarah Jessica Parker without makeup. ARGH!

Go straight to Post

Incoming search terms:

  • Powered by Article Dashboard consumer counseling credit ohio
  • powered by myBB seven days of creation
  • powered by vBulletin politics 101
  • Published News Upcoming News Submit a New Story Groups ohio consumer credit counseling

Elizabeth Warren touted Cherokee heritage in 1984 collection of recipes

by Doug Powers on Friday, May 18th, 2012

This is article 683 of 687 in the topic 2012 Elections

null

The epic saga of Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren (aka “Dances with Identity Theft”) continues. Personally, I don’t like finding out that politicians who are running for office in order to “serve the people” were once involved with a cookbook. It’s all too Twilight Zone-ish for my taste — but admittedly the metaphor isn’t much of a stretch.

Many moons ago, Warren submitted recipes for a Native American-themed cookbook. We’ll call Elizabeth’s latest recipe “cooked goose in hot water”:

Elizabeth Warren was touting her claim of Cherokee heritage as early as 1984, according to a cookbook titled “Pow Wow Chow” edited by her cousin that includes Warren’s recipes for a savory crab omelet and spicy barbecued beans.

The cookbook, edited by Warren’s cousin Candy Rowsey, is a compilation of “special recipes passed down through the Five Tribes families,” according to the introduction in a copy obtained by the Herald.

Warren, who has been under fire for claiming Indian lineage despite a lack of documentation, is identified as “Elizabeth Warren, Cherokee” under each of five recipes she contributes in the cookbook, published in 1984 by the Five Civilized Tribes Museum located in Muskogee. Warren is not listed as an official member of the Cherokee tribe and she has been unable thus far to document her claim of any Native American heritage.
[...]
News of Warren’s Cherokee recipes comes as outraged members of the tribe — including a Warren supporter — demanded she release her employment records following reports that she has no documentation to prove her Native American ancestry.

By way of Twitchy (who are collecting the mockery for full display as we speak), here’s a review of the cookbook at Amazon:

nullAnother satisfied customer!

I’m told Warren’s recipe for Macaroni & Cochise isn’t too bad though.

Go straight to Post

Incoming search terms:

  • powered by vBulletin california refinance home improvement loan first time home

Famous actor supporting higher taxes on the wealthy not a fan of new French President’s proposed tax rate

by Doug Powers on Friday, May 18th, 2012

This is article 156 of 158 in the topic Taxation/IRS

Actor Will Smith supports President Obama’s call for America’s top earners to pay more taxes. But where would he draw the line? Let’s just say Smith won’t be moving to France any time soon.

Here’s a brief transcript from an interview with Smith that ran on French television. Video via Real Clear Politics:

Will Smith: I have no issue with paying taxes and whatever needs to be done for my country to grow. I believe very firmly that my ability to sit here—I’m a black man who didn’t go to college, yet I get to travel around the world and sell my movies, and I believe very firmly that America is the only place on Earth that I could exist. So I will pay anything that I need to pay to keep my country growing. . . .

Interviewer: Do you know how much in France you would have to pay on earnings above one million euros [under new French President Francois Hollande's proposal]? Not 30%. 75%.

Smith: 75?! Yeah, that’s different, that’s different. Yeah, 75. Well, you know, God bless America.

Why is that “different”? Doesn’t he want his country to be able to continue to grow?

It’s great that Smith appreciates the opportunities America has provided him, but a shame he believes the reason for it has anything to do with a patriotic willingness to fund Washington’s out-of-control spending addictions.

Video to be filed under “This week’s lesson in ‘be careful what you ask for’”:

Go straight to Post

Facebook IPO causes unfriending of morning news

by Doug Powers on Friday, May 18th, 2012

This is article 23 of 23 in the topic Finance

Facebook is now officially listed on NASDAQ. I know this because I’ve heard it at least 65 times on the radio this morning, so I turned it off until the dust settles.

As of this moment shares are priced at $38, and the company is worth $104 billion. It would have been worth more but the IPO just wasn’t hyped enough!

Occupy Wall Street as yet has offered no comment on this latest expansion of Wall Street greed, but we’ll keep an eye out for it at their page on, uh, Facebook.

Meanwhile, it’s been confirmed: A $104 billion IPO heals all wounds. And Bono can’t be too unhappy either.

http://livestre.am/3hT5v

Go straight to Post

Bill Clinton: Only across-the-board tax increases can fix this mess

by Doug Powers on Thursday, May 17th, 2012

This is article 155 of 158 in the topic Taxation/IRS

Clinton is admitting here that the “Buffett Rule” would not solve any of our country’s massive deficit problems — which of course it wouldn’t. But that’s of little consequence anyway because the administration’s motivation behind the Buffett Rule ruse is one of fairness and not deficit reduction.

For a long time the government has been digging a hole we may never get out of, and Clinton is suggesting that part of the solution includes sending them more shovels? Yep:

Bill Clinton said Tuesday that President Barack Obama’s goal of hiking taxes on the rich alone is not enough to solve the country’s fiscal woes and suggested that middle class Americans must also eventually contribute more.

Clinton, who discussed a number of economic and political issues at the Peter G. Peterson Foundation’s third annual Fiscal Summit in Washington, D.C., prefaced his comments with the warning that he was giving his personal view and was “not speaking for the White House.”

“This is just me now, I’m not speaking for the White House — I think you could tax me at a 100 percent and you wouldn’t balance the budget,” said Clinton, who has earned tens of millions of dollars since leaving office. “We are all going to have to contribute to this, and if middle class people’s wages were going up again, and we had some growth to the economy, I don’t think they would object to going back to tax rates [from] when I was president” – before the Bush tax cuts.

Clinton’s idea is to wait for the economy to recover a little more and then crank up taxes across the board to start chipping away at the deficit. Spending cuts instead? He’d probably sooner invite Hillary to go through his text messages.

Trying to resuscitate the economy just so the government can then harvest the money reminds me of that death row inmate who got sick and the concerned warden spent countless hours helping him get better so he was eventually healthy enough to put in the chair.

Go straight to Post

Incoming search terms:

  • Powered by Article Dashboard federal income tax help
  • Powered by Article Dashboard lower back pain remedies
  • powered by SMF movies in columbus