Back to Basics

While citizens are trying to make elections honest, look what Texas legislators are doing while on the House floor!

A young woman was just about to finish up her first year of college. Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be a very liberal Democrat, and among other liberal ideals, she was very much in favor of higher taxes to support more government programs. In other words, redistribution of wealth.

She was deeply ashamed that her father was a staunch Conservative, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that she had participated in, and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her father had for years harbored an evil, selfish desire to keep what he thought should be his.

One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes on the rich and the need for more government programs. She shared with her father that she felt that many of the topics she and her professor went over were true. But he father interrupted her to ask how she was doing in school.

She responded that she was doing very well. She had earned a 4.0 GPA throughout her first year.

Asked how she came to achieve such high marks, the young woman said she made school a priority and worked very hard to do so. She managed her time well, did her homework and studied when she needed to, and did not spend an excess of time goofing off or partying.

The father asked how one of her friends Mary was doing in school.

The young woman responded that Mary was doing terribly and had only earned a 2.0 GPA. After being asked why, the young woman said that Mary just wasn’t working as hard, she was out partying most nights, and made very little effort to manage her time and make school a priority.

Her father then asked her, “Well, why don’t you go to the Dean’s office and ask him if he could deduct a point off of your GPA and add that to Mary’s, that way both of you will have a 3.0 GPA?”

The daughter, visibly shocked by the suggestion, responded, “That’s a crazy idea! I worked hard for my grades while Mary has been messing around. I deserve my grades after all the hard work I have put in!”

The father slowly smiled, winked, and said, “Welcome to the conservative’s philosophy.”

SHARE this article with all of your friends who doubt your conservative vision.

The progressives have claimed the United States Constitution is outdated. Nancy Pelosi has even suggested we amend the 1^st amendment to restrict free speech.

Conservatives understand just how important the constitution is to the protection of our freedoms and the preservation of our country.

Is the constitution outdated?

Shane Krauser gives a powerful interpretation on this issue.

If you have never seen Shane speak you are missing out. He is the Director at the American Academy for Constitutional Education and holds many other educational positions as well. His knowledge, experience and dedication will inspire and challenge you to learn more about this timeless document.

Visit the American Academy for Constitutional Education at www.aafce.com

Another attack on states rights. Maricopa County is fortunate to have a sheriff willing to do the  job he was ELECTED to do and stand up to the bullying and threats from the Obama administration and the DOJ.

NEWS RELEASE from www.msco.org

Date: April 3, 2012
DOJ TO SHERIFF ARPAIO: “MONITOR ABSOLUTELY MANDATORY”
ARPAIO TO DOJ: “I WILL NOT SURRENDER MY OFFICE TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT”

(Phoenix, AZ) A series of meetings between representatives for Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the U.S. Department of Justice were slated to begin tomorrow to discuss ways to resolve allegations of racial profiling by Sheriff’s employees.

But hours before the first meeting, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Roy Austin of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division called Arpaio’s attorneys with an ultimatum. Austin stated that it was absolutely mandatory for the Sheriff’s Office to agree to have an outside monitor otherwise there is no reason for further meetings.

Appointment of an outside monitor essentially usurps the powers and duties of an elected Sheriff and transfers them to a person or group of persons selected by the federal government. Every policy decision, every operation, every new program in the jails and in enforcement, virtually everything would have to be approved by the monitor, nullifying the authority of the elected Sheriff and eviscerating the will of the citizens of Maricopa County.

“I am the constitutionally and legitimately elected Sheriff and I absolutely refuse to surrender my responsibility to the federal government. And so to the Obama administration, who is attempting to strong arm me into submission only for its political gain, I say, ‘This will not happen, not on my watch!’”

Sheriff’s Deputy Director and Attorney Jack MacIntyre says a federal monitor is the most extreme proposal, particularly in light of the fact that the federal government has refused to provide any details or proof as to how they came to the conclusion that Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office employees engage in patterns and practices of racial profiling as well as other unsupported claims that the DOJ has widely publicized.

MacIntyre stated “We have never agreed to a monitor replacing the duly elected Sheriff. We have always been open to negotiating these issues raised by the DOJ, but never the appointment of a monitor.” END

Wisconsin has been under attack by the unions and have undergone a number of recall elections. With the recall election of Gov. Scott Walker just around the corner you have to question the integrity of the elections with information like the following coming out.

High Error Rate in Milwaukee County Election Day Registrations Found

MacIver News Service | January 11, 2012

[Milwaukee, Wisc] A shocking new report by a Wisconsin Tea Party group raises serious questions about the diligence of poll workers in Milwaukee County.

The group, Wisconsin Grandsons of Liberty, found errors on more than one third of all Election Day Registration forms completed for the April 5, 2011 election in Milwaukee County.

“We discovered 3,739 forms with errors,” said Larry Gamble, the groups’ spokesperson. “That 33.7% error rate is high enough to question the entire election process and raises doubts about having the accuracy and accountability required to properly manage elections.”

To read the complete article click HERE

Recently I have come to know a number of immigrants, many from communist countries, who are speaking up about what they see happening in the United States. They came to this country to obtain the freedoms not available in their homelands, and they cherish these freedoms more than anything. They are warning the citizens of the US of the correlations between their communist homelands and what they are witnessing in the United States today under President Obama. When you speak to them you can see the fear and feel the desperation, begging us to help stop what is happening in our country.

Below is a letter received from a former Russian citizen.

Dear Occupier:

Do you really mean all that Fair Share, Fair Shots, Social Justice, Equality? Do you know what these words mean in REAL life?

FAIR SHOTS means that 200 million innocent people were tortured and murdered by their own communist regimes in the Soviet Union, China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Romania, East Germany, Algeria and Cuba.

FAIR SHARE means that tens of millions of innocent citizens were and are incarcerated in the labor camps or mental institutions by communist regimes. Tens of thousands of them had died and are dying of starvation, extreme conditions, diseases and hard work.

SOCIAL JUSTICE means forced labor of the prisoners of the labor camps; no freedom, no liberty, no rights, and no justice at all under any communist regime.

EQUALITY means that the members of the government of the communist regime live in multimillion dollar palaces, having billions of dollars stashed in the Swiss banks, and the rest of the population lives in abject poverty, misery and constant fear and terror.

Communist government officials have their own dollar stores, private schools, exclusive universities, hospitals and excellent health care. None of it is available to citizens.

Communist governments take away weapons from the citizens by the decrees and then murder tens of millions of their own innocent people. They call it gun control.

You don’t believe me? Just Google the information on Labor Camps, Holodomor, History of USSR, History of Soviet Ukraine, etc.

Sincerely,

Former citizen of Russia

Sheriff Joe Arpaio

In a press conference today, Sheriff Joe Arpaio announced the findings of his volunteer cold case posse into the investigation of Obama’s birth certificate

While a number of news stations carried the conference via streaming video, I was watching on KPHO 5 in Phoenix. They carried the information on the birth certificate but once the topic switched to the selective service record their stream stopped and no additional video was available. WND carried the entire news conference live, but their stream was quite chopping, apparently from too many viewers trying to watch.

News reporters tried to distract from the birth certificate issue and launched attacks at Arpaio, claiming is was politically motivated or attempting to ask about non-related issues. Arpaio kept the questions on topic and made it clear this in no way was political in nature. In fact, the Tea Party request was delivered to Arpaio’s office in August, 2011 and the attacks from the Eric Holder justice department didn’t start until December, 2011.

One reporter seemed to question Arpaio’s ability to investigate since he is just a county sheriff. For the record: Sheriff Joe Arpaio served in the Army from 1950 to 1954 in the Medical Detachment Division and was stationed in France for part of the time as a military policeman. Following his discharge in 1954, Arpaio moved to Washington D.C. and became a police officer, moving in 1957 to Las Vegas, NV. He served as a police officer in Las Vegas for six months before being appointed as a special agentwith the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, which later became part of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).  During his 25-year tenure with the DEA, he was stationed in Argentina, Turkey and Mexico, and advanced through the ranks to the position of head of the DEA’s Arizona branch. Arpaio has been elected Sheriff of Maricopa County since 1992. (Source Wikipedia)

Here is the official news release from the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. Videos of the investigation follow.

Arpaio suspects forgery

March 1, 2012
(Phoenix, AZ) Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio in a press conference today told reporters, “A six month long investigation conducted by my cold case posse has lead me to believe there is probable cause to believe that President Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate released by the White House on April 27, 2011, is a computer-generated forgery. I do not believe that it is a scan of an original 1961 paper document, as represented by the White House when the long-form birth certificate was made public.”

This is the principle preliminary finding of a six-month on-going Sheriff’s Cold Case Posse law enforcement investigation into the authenticity of Obama’s birth certificate and his eligibility to be president.

Investigators advised Sheriff Arpaio that the forgers committed two crimes: first, in creating a fraudulent document which the White House characterized, knowingly or unknowingly, as an officially produced governmental birth record; and second, in fraudulently presenting that document to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large as “proof positive” of President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.

I saw this post on Facebook, author unknown. This pretty much sums it up!

Ineptocracy New Word: Could not find it in my old Webster’s. Googled it and discovered it is a recently coined word found on a T-shirt on eBay. Getting really close to the bone! Read this one over slowly and absorb the facts that totally are within this sentence!

Ineptocracy (in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.

I love this word and believe that it will become a recognized English word. Finally, a word to describe our current political situation.

by Michael Connelly

Mr. Connelly teaches law, including constitutional law, through Education to Go, an online company that provides courses to numerous universities. The author of three books and publisher of a website, he resides in Carrollton, Texas, and can be reached by email.

I have recently been asked by a number of different people if I think that the President of the United States, Barack Obama, has committed any offenses that subject him to being impeached by the Congress of the United States. The answer is without a doubt yes because he is repeatedly breached his oath of office. The oath of office of the President of the United States the simple and concise. It reads:

“I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Instead of living up to that oath, President Obama has actively attempted to subvert, ignore, and completely destroy large parts of the Constitution. I believe the President of the United States is well aware of what he is doing, and it is completely intentional. Listed below are what I believe are impeachable offenses and the list continues to grow.

To continue reading click HERE