Well, you may be surprised to read this but they are at it again.. Some of the vaunted liberal “scientists” are making their usual predictions based upon nothingness.. The progressive pattern reveals the same hysteria-driven drivel that is only taken “seriously” at San Francisco socialist soirees and within the walls of Congress.. By the way, those are the only ones who are listening and when the first group begins puling to the second group, all of our wallets become a little lighter..
If it isn’t another “Ice Age”, it is “Globaloney Warming”. If it isn’t the “Population Explosion” it is the “World-Wide Famine”.. The estrogen levels of the liberals has to be about as high as their IQ’s, this is why they always resort to such sophistry which is based upon the same type of sound “science” that all of their other previous predictions have been scrupulously scripted from..
Yahoo news reports (hopefully tongue in cheek) that “Mankind may have unleashed the sixth known mass extinction in Earth’s history..” We can’t necessarily blame Yahoo for this as this frightening scenario has come from “the science journal Nature..” When dealing with the liberals and their histrionics, there should be some panel assembled to verify and justify their use of the term “science”. Like every other word that drips from the mealy mouth of a liberal, the word is cheapened by their use, overuse and abuse of it..
The indoctrination for the uninitiated begins early on in the article. “Over the past 540 million years, five mega-wipeouts of species have occurred through naturally-induced events..” Please note the use of the liberal “scientific” term, “mega-wipeouts”.. The important point to remember here is that these have “occurred through naturally-induced events..” Who can see the direction that this is going, “left” maybe?
“But the new threat is man-made, inflicted by habitation loss, over-hunting, over-fishing, the spread of germs and viruses and introduced species and by climate change caused by fossil-fuel greenhouse gases, says the study..” Shall we delve into this?
OF COURSE this is “man-made”, how else can all of the liberal parallel phantasms be brought into play? “Habitation loss” needs more environmental protection, “over-hunting” and “over-fishing” needs the attention of the animal rights lunatics. The liberals themselves are personally responsible for a number of “germs and viruses” that have certainly plagued mankind since the sixties, but since mankind is the “victim” and not the “blind albino crotch tick”, no harm no foul.. According to the “scientists”, “climate change” (Globaloney Warming 2.0..) caused by greenhouse gases HAS to be the real “threat”.. The liberal’s biggest push, with all of its “green jobs” and its “enviro-friendly” fuels, is directly related to the “big scare” surrounding “greenhouse gases”..
“Paleobiologists at the University of Berkeley looked at the state of biodiversity..” Hold it right there, bub.. “Biodiversity” is a liberal scam founded in the liberal scam of “diversity”. Using the liberal “definitional inversion” chart, “diversity”, regardless of where it is incorporated by the liberals, is actually “exclusion” based upon a number of theories. (Example: the “diversity” of quotas is the “exclusion” of the more qualified.) It is nothing more than their fascism fomented by fiction. “Diversity” is the smiley happy face applied to their “I am right because I am left” mindset of exclusion..
“Researcher” Anthony Baronsky said, “It looks like modern extinction rates resemble mass extinction rates..” Note the scientific certainty in the words, “looks like”.. I am more concerned with what this “smells like”.. This is just more of the liberal “science” of 2+2 equaling 64.. This mere guesswork continues on. “This picture is supported by the outlook for mammals in the ‘critically endangered’ and ‘currently threatened’ categories of the Red List (what other list would the liberals compile..) of biodiversity compiled by the International Union for Conservation of Nature..” “Critically endangered and currently threatened” are the biodiversity equivalent of “shovel ready jobs” and “jobs saved or created”.. Again, please note that these dark GUESSES are based upon the sound “science” of “the outlook”..
Baronsky just could not control himself.. “On the assumption that these species are wiped out and biodiversity loss continues unchecked, ‘the sixth mass extinction could arrive within as little as three to 22 centuries..’” After the first three words of that silly soliloquy, the rest of the words thereafter are of no “scientific” value.. “On the assumption”.. The ONLY “science” that relies on “assumptions” is the liberal “science” of sorcery.. Make note of the liberal word “unchecked” and try to imagine just for a moment what the liberals would like to do to keep things in “check” and how much that will cost you..
I suppose that since the “science” behind globaloney warming was exposed to the light of truth, these “scientists” wanted to get ahead of the curve. “The authors admitted to weaknesses in the study..” This admission is there only to placate momentarily. “They acknowledge that the fossil record is far from complete, that mammals provide an imperfect benchmark of Earth’s biodiversity and further work is needed to confirm their suspicions..” “Further work” needs FURTHER FUNDING and if they manage to scare enough of the mentally malleable, this should be only a minor hurdle..
Can you logically call it “science” when such terms as “admitted weakness”, “far from complete”, “imperfect benchmark” and “on the assumption” are peppered throughout an article reporting these so called “findings”? When intellectually cornered, Baronsky says, “Only two percent of all species have gone extinct in the groups we can look at clearly, so by those numbers, we are far down the road to extinction..” “Two percent” and we are “far down the road to extinction”? At “two percent” we are far FROM extinction.. If “two percent” scares this “scientist”, what does the Obama TEN percent unemployment leave behind in his knickers? The “scientist” continues to sing for his socialist supper by adding, “we still have a lot of Earth’s biota to save..” Which means, “we still need a lot of money, we need a lot of ‘funding’”..
Echoing this plea for “funding”, French biologist Gilles Boeuf said, “at this rate, it will take us a thousand years to record all of Earth’s biodiversity..” A thousand years of “funding” for fascist flatulence.. Boeuf decides to ramp up the rhetoric, “but at the rate things are going, by the end of this century, we may well have wiped out half of them..” If this is true, we will save at least fifty percent of the cost of “funding” these “scientists” as they won’t need to count what isn’t there.. Then again, this is the liberal exact “science” of “we may well have” wiped out half..
When it comes to the liberals and their faux “science” of hysteria based upon uneducated hunches and goofy guesses, the only “mass extinction” that seems imperative is that of the liberals and their “scientists” themselves.. Were this to come to fruition, it would more closely resemble “ass extinction”..