Cities On Fire – Dallas/Garland

by on May 10th, 2015

By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton
NoisyRoom.net
Hat Tip: Arlen Williams

How very appropriate that on May Day, May 1st (Commie Day), protests were staged in Dallas, Texas against immigration and police brutality. Two groups joined forces for the protests: Mothers Against Police Brutality and the Texas Organizing Project. Their common stated goal was an end to law enforcement terrorizing their communities. Translation… the federalization of our police forces. The protests in Dallas were only violent in message, not deed, but they are setting the country on fire Constitutionally and figuratively. This is not grassroots – it’s staged. Things are never ever what they seem anymore.

Let’s have a look at exactly who was behind the protests in Dallas on May Day…

We’ll start with Moms Against Police Brutality. I’m sure all of you have heard of the various Mom’s groups out there: Moms Against Drunk Driving, Moms Against Guns, Moms Against Knives and now Moms Against Police Brutality. There are a number of others as well out there. I suspect they all have similar roots.

The mission of Mothers Against Police Brutality is to:

Unite and support Mothers and families nationwide whose children’s lives were stolen and have suffered injustice at the hands of local police.
End the killing of unarmed and mentally ill persons by law enforcement personnel.
Change police deadly force policies, practices and training.
Hold police accountable through independent investigations of misconduct, brutality and homicide by police officers.
Help restore trust between police and the communities they are sworn to serve and protect.

In the end – what their mission is boils down to the nationalization of our police forces. Plain and simple. Brought to you by Barack Obama and his wing man, Al Sharpton.

Their partners are some very familiar organizations. Along with numerous chapters of Students Against Police Brutality, their national partners include:

Bill of Rights Defense BORDC
Chicago Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression
CodePink.org
CommonGround.org
CopBlock.org
DRUM
Families Living for Justice
National Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression
MoveOn
M.O.T.I.V.E
The Prodigal Child Project
Stop Mass Incarceration Network
Texas Moms United to End the War on Drugs
Veterans for Peace

And what do a number of these groups have in common? The Communist Party USA and United for Peace and Justice: UFPJ is a coalition of more than 1400 local and national groups throughout the United States who have joined together to protest the immoral and disastrous Iraq War and oppose our government’s policy of permanent warfare and empire-building. They are a partner organization of the Institute for Policy Studies, which in essence is George Soros. The National Coordinator is Leslie Cagan. Several Marxist organizations are involved in the UFPJ leadership, but the most influential has been the Communist Party USA, through their members and Steering Committee such as National Coordinator Judith LeBlanc, Steering Committee members such as Jacqueline Cabasso, Libero Della Piana and Siri Margerin and affiliate leaders including Rosalio Munoz, Alfred Marder and Erica Smiley.

Mothers Against Police Brutality also allies with Cornel West. They gave a special thank you to the Nation of Islam as well for providing security.


Protesting Police Brutality (Shutterstock)

Texas Organizing Project is the new alias for ACORN. ACORN is the Progressive zombie organization exposed by James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles that just won’t die. They just keep being resurrected under different names.

TOP received $20,000 from the Tides Foundation – yep, George Soros again.

1 2 3 4 5
Go straight to Post

It Takes a Good Guy with a Gun to Defend Freedom of Speech

by on May 10th, 2015

When two terrorists in body armor and carrying assault rifles came for a roomful of cartoonists and fans of freedom of speech in Texas, the media took the side of the terrorists.

CAIR, a Muslim Brotherhood front group with ties to terrorists, spun the attack by claiming that the contest had been intended to “bait” the terrorists. The media quickly picked up the “bait” meme.

The New York Times, the Atlantic Journal Constitution, the Dallas Morning News, CNN and even FOX News all accused the cartoonists of “baiting” the poor Muslim terrorists into attacking them. The actual attempt at mass slaughter was dismissed as the terrorists “taking the bait” from the cartoonists who had been fiendishly plotting to be mass slaughtered by them for the publicity.

The Washington Post not only stated that the contest was “bait”, but its headline huffed, “Event organizer offers no apology after thwarted attack in Texas.” And why won’t the 9/11 dead apologize?

Journalists often tell us that a free press is the best defense for a free society. Every major newspaper and news network once again proved them wrong. The best defense for freedom of speech came not from the journalists or the civil rights groups, from the speechmakers or the activists. It came from an off-duty traffic cop working security outside the event targeted by Muslim terrorists. His partner, an older guard, didn’t even have a gun, and took a bullet to the leg.

He could have pulled back and let the terrorists have a clear path. No doubt he had a family and plenty of reasons to live. Like so much of the media, he could have disguised this cowardice by blaming the cartoonists for bringing the attack on themselves. Instead he held the line. The traffic cop with a pistol took on two terrorists in body armor, armed with assault rifles and extra ammo. And when it was over, two Muslim terrorists were dead and freedom of speech was alive.

“He had two people shooting at him, plus he’s trying to take out two targets. And if he had to make headshots,” Mark Sligar, a firearms instructor, said, “That’s awesome shooting. And look at the people’s lives he saved, just because he was able to take care of that.”

Like Kevin Vickers, the retired 58-year-old Sergeant-at-Arms, who armed with a 9mm handgun stopped Muslim terrorist Zehaf-Bibeau from carrying out a massacre of Canadian parliamentarians, the unnamed older police officer did more to protect freedom than all the self-styled defenders of freedom ever have.

And he did it with the tool that many of those defenders of freedom want to outlaw; a gun.

The left promises us collective security through civil rights while taking away our freedom. Their idea of collective security is disarming the citizenry, then disarming the police and then appeasing the killers. There will be more murders than ever, but at least those carrying them out will be representatives of oppressed groups, such as inner city drug dealers and ISIS terrorists, ‘punching up’ at the privileged.

We’ve already seen how worthless collective security is. In Baltimore, the Democratic mayor turned over the city to rioters and looters.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

How Can So Many World Leaders Be So Wrong?

by on May 10th, 2015

 

By Alan Caruba
In a recent Daily Caller article, Michael Bastach took note of “25 Years of predicting The Global Warming ‘Tipping Point’.” This is the message that the Earth is warming rapidly and, if we don’t abandon the use of fossil fuels for power, it will arrive to wreak destruction on the human race and all life on the planet.
It is astounding how many past and present world leaders are telling everyone this despite the total lack of any real science, nor any actual warming—the Earth has been in a natural cooling cycle since 1997!
At the heart of the global warming—now called climate change—“crisis” has been the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that has been issuing apocalyptic predictions since its inception in 1988. None of its predictions have come true. How could they, based as they are on the false science of computer models, not that based on observable climate events and trends?
To this day our own government through its meteorological agencies has been caught manipulating the data gathered over the years to conform with the “warming” scenario. The worst has been the Environmental Protection Agency which is engaged in an effort to shut down coal-fired utilities and access to every other energy source on which we depend to power the nation.
Despite this national and international effort, mostly likely based on the liberal ideology that there are too many humans on the plant and dramatic ways must be found to reduce that number. In the past these anti-humanity advocates could depend on famine, disease and wars to kill off millions, but in the modern world that has become less of a threat.
One libertarian think tank, the Heartland Institute, has been leading the battle against the global warming/climate change hoax for a decade. As a Heartland policy advisor I have had a front row seat. In June, Heartland will sponsor the Tenth International Conference on Climate Change bringing together some of the world’s leading scientists to recommend that it is time for Congress to “take a fresh look at climate science”, “explore better science-based policies for energy and the environment”, and, bluntly stated, to “start over on the question of global warming?”
It did not surprise me to learn that Heartland had dispatched staff to Rome when the Pope announced he too was joining the “climate change” advocates despite its lack of any basis in science. The group garnered tons of international media coverage by simply presenting the truth. You can find out more about them here,  It didn’t take long for Jeffrey Sachs, a Columbia University professor and ‘special advisor” to United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, to write a commentary condemning global warming “deniers” that appeared on a Catholic website called Pewsitter.
Sachs took particular aim at The Heartland Institute and, despite not attending its Rome press conference or any of the presentations the experts provided, did not hesitate to identify Heartland as having been supported for years by the Koch brothers, known for the support of conservative groups and causes.
Joseph Bast, Heartland president, does not let such cheap shots pass by. “The Heartland Instituter has received just $25,000 from a single organization, a charitable foundation affiliated with the Koch brothers during the past 15 years.

Click to continue reading “How Can So Many World Leaders Be So Wrong?”
Go straight to Post

Lessons for why the polls seem to be so wrong lately?

by on May 9th, 2015

Here are a few interesting notes on the problems that we are experiencing with polling and why the problems aren’t going to get any better in the near future.  From Politico:

. . . But changes in communications are threatening the viability of public election polling in many developed countries where the landline phone was once a reliable medium for representative surveys 

Like their counterparts in the United States, Britons are abandoning their landlines. Telephone pollsters have shifted, contacting an increasing percentage of their respondents via mobile phone, but perhaps not enough, according to many pollsters. In the United States, polling mobile phones is far more expensive than relying on landlines, because survey researchers are required by law to enter cellphone numbers manually when dialing. . . .

Alberto Nardelli, data editor at The Guardian newspaper, noted last month that phone polls tended to favor the Tories, while Labour performed better in Internet polls. That phenomenon existed as late as a week ago, according to the New Statesman’s “May 2015” website.

“I would be concerned about what looks like systematic errors in the British polling — under-representation of Conservative voters and overestimation of support for the Labour Party,” said University of Michigan professor Michael Traugott. “I haven’t seen any polls that suggested that the Scottish National Party was going to do extremely well in Scotland at the expense of Labour primarily. So, systematic errors like that, patterned errors like that, suggest methodological problems.”

(Similarly, in Israel, some observers believe Web polling was biased against Netanyahu’s Likud Party and swayed the overall balance of pre-election forecasts.) . . .

Telephone polls are increasingly unreliable and too expensive, while Internet polling isn’t yet able to replace truly random surveys. . . .

Go straight to Post

Celebrating Mothers

by on May 7th, 2015

 By Alan Caruba
As someone who had the great good fortune to have had a remarkable mother, a woman who embraced being my Mother by providing unconditional love and support for my various activities and decisions over the course of my life, I approach the subject of motherhood with the knowledge that this does not apply to everyone.
I have friends whose mothers were true horror stories. One wonders how they survived theirs. And, of course, I can only approach the topic from a son’s point of view. A mother’s relationship with a daughter may differ, but I cannot speak to it. Daughters, too, have benefitted or paid a price for their mothers.
What struck me as I contemplated the forthcoming Mother’s Day was the way my Mother, born in the early 1900’s both loved being a mother and, well before the woman’s movement that demanded equality, was in the adult school workplace teaching the art of gourmet cuisine for some three decades.
Rebecca acquired a great following and her classes were always sold old. Mother, who occasionally expressed regret she had not attended college, had an encyclopedic knowledge, not only of food, but of wines. Not only would she author two cookbooks, she would become the first woman board member of the Sommelier Society of America.
Need it be said that dinner was the highlight of our days together, Mother, my Father Robert, and myself. An older brother was largely gone out of our lives as the result of service in the Army and marriage shortly thereafter.
Mother brought to her classes the philosophy she lived at home. My Father adored her. Their marriage exceeded sixty years together. He delighted in her success. That was reflected in an atmosphere of love that imbued our lives together.
Mother lived to age 98, passing away in 2002. A day never passes without thoughts of her. I was truly blessed in the same way my Father, her friends, and countless students felt. She imparted a philosophy that saw life as a constant opportunity to learn about one’s passions and to pursue them.
The modern American holiday of Mother’s Day was first celebrated in 1908 when Anna Jarvis held a memorial for her mother in Grafton, West Virginia. She had begun her campaign to have Mother’s Day become a recognized holiday in 1905, the year her mother passed away. As she put it, your mother is “the person who has done more for you than anyone in the world.” Several states officially recognized Mother’s Day and in 1914 President Wilson signed a proclamation creating Mother’s Day on the second Sunday in May as a national holiday.
There have been men whose mother’s contributed in significant ways to the success they achieved. To call them Mama’s Boys is to realize that the relationship had both a good and not so good effect on them. Elvis Presley began his rise when he went to Sun Records in Memphis to record some songs as a birthday present for his mother, Gladys. He was her only child and had a very close, loving relationship. She was living with him at Graceland until she passed away in 1958.
Another Mama’s Boy was General Douglas MacArthur.

Click to continue reading “Celebrating Mothers”
Go straight to Post

Could Jade Helm be America’s Operation Valkyrie?

by on April 21st, 2015

What do you think of when you hear “Valkyrie?” Most Americans will automatically think of the 2008 major film of the same name that depicts the July 20, 1944 assassination plot against Adolph Hitler. That, however, is only part of the story, or the “second half,” of the real Operation Valkyrie that existed in Nazi Germany. As the Jade Helm 15 military “exercises” approach, we need to understand the full scope of Operation Valkyrie through the prism of American history, from Operation Paperclip onward. We need to know true history, and not the revisionist history taught in government schools.

Operation Valkyrie was Nazi Germany’s emergency continuity of government operations plan issued to the Territorial Reserve Army of Germany to execute and implement in case of a general breakdown in the civil order of the nation. Designed by the head of the German Army and approved by Hitler, it was designed to deal with internal disturbances and quell citizen uprisings in emergency situations. A particular threat was the potential uprising of millions of forced laborers working in German factories.

That was the initial purpose and backbone of Operation Valkyrie until it was surreptitiously modified by several high-ranking German Army officers for the purpose of taking Germany back from the Nazi leadership under Hitler after his planned assassination on July 20, 1944. As anyone who knows history or watched the 2008 movie Valkyrie, the assassination plot failed. Accordingly, most people only know half of the story.

Thinking outside of the box now, what if the Jade Helm “exercises” are planned as a preemptive measure to implement the original intent of the Nazi plan Operation Valkyrie?

Many awake and thinking Americans know that there is a seething hatred by our current leadership of proponents of our Constitution, our right to bear arms, our national sovereignty, our Judeo-Christian faith, as well as our heritage and our culture. There has been a notable awakening that poses a threat to the plans, plots and schemes of our leadership who answer not to the American people, but to the interests of a global government.

We stand at the precipice of any number of events that could cause a civil uprising, including a global economic meltdown, a terror attack or series of attacks (either real or false-flag), or even natural disasters. We’ve witnessed the redefinition of “enemies of the state” to real American patriots who present a roadblock to the takeover of our nation by the global elite. Time appears to be running out.

Therefore, would it be inconceivable to consider that Jade Helm 15, or any concurrent or future military “exercises” of this type could be America’s Operation Valkyrie as it was initially drafted and approved by Hitler and the Nazi leadership?

It is imperative that we not only know but understand history. Keep this in mind the next time you see a column of military equipment rolling down Main Street, USA.

Go straight to Post

The Environmental Insane Asylum

by on April 21st, 2015

By Alan Caruba

Earth Day was declared in 1970 and for the past 45 years we have all been living in the Environmental Insane Asylum, being told over and over again to believe things that are the equivalent of Green hallucinations. Now the entire month of April has been declared Earth Month, but in truth not a day goes by when we are not assailed with the bold-faced lies that comprise environmentalism.

Around the globe, the worst part of this is that we are being victimized by people we are told to respect from the President of the United States to the Pope of the Catholic Church. Their environmentalism is pure socialism.

Organizations whom we expect to tell the truth keep telling us that “climate change is one of the biggest global security threats of the 21st century.”  This was a recent statement by “world leaders” like the G7, a group of finance ministers and central bank governors of seven advanced economies, the International Monetary Fund, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United States. On April 17 they adopted a report about the “threat” put together by think tanks that included the European Union Institute for Security Studies and the Wilson Center in Washington, D.C.

When I speak of “climate” I am referring to data gathered not just about decades, but centuries of the Earth’s cycles of warming and cooling. When I speak of “weather”, the closest any of us get to it other than today’s, are local predictions no longer than a few days’ time at best. The weather is in a constant state of flux.

Climate change is not a threat and most certainly there is no global warming. As Prof. Bob Carter, a geologist at James Cook College in Queensland, Australia, has written, “For many years now, human-caused climate change has been viewed as a large and urgent problem. In truth, however, the biggest part of the problem is neither environmental nor scientific, but a self-created political fiasco.”

The fact that the Earth is now into the nineteenth year of a natural planetary cooling cycle seems to never be acknowledged or reported. “The problem here,” says Prof. Carter, “is not that of climate change per se, but rather that of the sophisticated scientific brainwashing that has been inflicted on the public, bureaucrats and politicians alike.”

In a book I recommend to everyone, “Climate for the Layman” by Anthony Bright-Paul, he draws on the best well-known science about the Earth noting that “Since there is no such thing as a temperature of the whole Earth all talk of global warming is simply illogical, ill thought out, and needs to be discarded for the sake of clarity. The globe is warming and cooling in different locations concurrently every minute of the day and night.”

“Since it is abundantly clear that there is no one temperature of the atmosphere all talk of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is simply an exercise in futility.” A look at the globe from either of its two poles to its equator and everything in between tells us with simple logic that being able to determine its “temperature” is impossible.

1 2 3
Go straight to Post

The Oklahoma City Bombing Investigation: To Demonize Conservatives, Constitutionalists & Christians

by on April 20th, 2015

Investigative Report by Douglas J. Hagmann

Sunday, April 19, 2015 marked the 20th anniversary of the bombing that killed 171 Americans (168 men, women and children, and three unborn), and injured over 500 others in the heartland of the United States: the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. As of that date, it was the worst domestic terrorist attack in U.S. history.

Placed in proper contextual and historical perspective, the bombing of the Murrah Building was bookended by two other attacks on American soil: the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center and the attacks of September 11, 2001.

According to the official accounts, the 1993 and 2001 attacks were officially attributed to foreign, Middle Eastern actors. The 1995 bombing, however, was officially blamed on two crazed right-wing zealots intent on extracting revenge for the U.S. government’s assault on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas exactly two years earlier, on April 19, 1993, in which 80 men, women and children were killed.

Arrested and convicted for the Murrah building bombings were Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols. McVeigh, 33, was put to death by chemical injection on June 11, 2001 at the United States penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana. He was the first person to be executed by the federal government since 1963. Nichols is serving a life sentence in the Supermax Prison in Florence, Colorado.

Revisionist History

Having just marked the twentieth anniversary of the 1995 bombing in America’s heartland, it is absolutely critical that we shed our ideological and intellectual blinders and step out of the scripted government accounts that have been thrust upon us and reiterated by a controlled and obedient media. Today, we have the ability to look back in recent history to dissect and better understand the agenda of those who actually wrote the script. For it is this very narrative that served as the official opening salvo to depict all Christians, Constitutionalists, and Conservatives as domestic terrorists that began in earnest under the Clinton administration. It is this same narrative that has been refined and expanded through subsequent administrations and parroted by the corporate media.

For the Marxists who have infiltrated the American political system and their captive media, the official account of the Oklahoma City bombing was the exclamation point purposely and expeditiously placed at the end of the paragraph that included Waco and Ruby Ridge. The arrest and conviction of Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols was the much-needed mechanism of the Progressive left against the Christian Conservative right during that period of the 1990’s. It continues to serve as the cornerstone for the nefarious agenda that has re-categorized Christians, Conservatives and Constitutionalists as enemies of the state, using the blood of the innocent dead and maimed.

We must not forget that this push for demonization was managed by the Clinton administration which also included Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the Department of Justice under Janet Reno.

1 2 3 4
Go straight to Post

If you want to go to a fast food restaurant where other customers share your political views, here is the list

by on April 20th, 2015

This list was put together by the Wall Street Journal.  Interestingly, Liberals congregate in only three fast food restaurants.  Conservatives appear more spread out.  Conservatives don’t dominate any restaurant the way that Liberals do — CHIPOTLE and AU BON PAIN.  If you include a restaurant where Liberals are just as likely as not to go to (a rating of 100), you would get a third restaurant: Jack-in-the-box.  By contrast there are six restaurants where Conservatives have a rating of 103 or higher and nine where they are above 100.

It would be interesting to see how Starbucks was for conservatives before their meaningless statement of asking people not to bring guns into their restaurants.

Go straight to Post

The Prison Called Cuba

by on April 20th, 2015

By Alan Caruba

We are told we need to feel sympathy for the Cuban people who have suffered from a U.S. embargo and lack of diplomatic recognition. That ignores a long history of oppression in Cuba no matter who was in charge.

Prior to Fidel Castro, Cubans were in the grip of Flugencio Batista who overthrew the existing government in September 1933 and then dominated Cuban politics for the next 25 years until Castro’s revolutionary movement took control of the capitol in January 1959.

Fifty-six years ago in 1959, I was about to graduate from the University of Miami and among my friends were young Cubans sent there to get a degree. I have often wondered which among them returned to Cuba and which, like those who could afford it, were joined by their family who fled Cuba.

The U.S. had been involved with Cuba from the end of the Spanish-American War in 1898 when Spain ceded Puerto Rico, the Philippines, and Guam for $20 million. We stayed in Cuba until it was granted independence in 1902 as the Republic of Cuba. Its first president faced an armed revolt in 1906 so we returned to briefly occupy Cuba to restore some stability, but they never really got the hand of being a democratic self-governing nation.

How much better it would have been for the Cubans if the U.S. had decided to make the island a territory like Puerto Rico. Then we could have let the island prosper without having to end up with becoming a Communist nation closely allied, first with the Soviet Union and after its collapse in 1991, with others like China and Venezuela.

The lesson we might be expected to draw from this is that Communism does not work. It is an utterly failed economic and social system that can only stay in power by jailing or executing anyone who resists. That is exactly what the brothers, Fidel and Raul Castro, have done since seizing power. One consistency of the past five decades has been the anti-America policies they have pursued.

The reason given by Obama was that U.S. policies toward Cuba “have not worked” and that it is time for a change. There is some truth in this and it should be noted that Canada has long had good relations with Cuba as have European and, of course, Latin and South American nations.

Even so, what are we to conclude from the report that Russia plans to join military drills with Cuba and North Korea that may also include Vietnam and Brazil? Russia’s aggression in Ukraine has left it sanctioned and isolated, so the military drills send a message that it still has nations friendly to it, but what nations!

Cuba was caught not long ago when it attempted to ship weapons to North Korea, so we are talking about two dedicated Communist nations. Over the years, it has more than demonstrated its anti-American hostility.

Generally, there is little to be gained by exchanging embassies or relieving Cuba. Lifting our embargo and other sanctions leaves the U.S. with even less leverage, if any.

Click to continue reading “The Prison Called Cuba”
Go straight to Post

Featuring YD Feedwordpress Content Filter Plugin